The Multidisciplinary Approach for the Diagnosis of Laryngohyoid Lesions: a Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The diagnosis of neck lesions remains a medico-legal diagnostic challenge because of the complexity of the anatomical relationship of the neck's organs and their anthropometric morphological variability. We compared the multidisciplinary approach using autopsy and postmortem computed tomography (PMCT), postmortem fine preparation (PMFP), postmortem micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), and postmortem magnetic resonance (PMMR) with the performance of a single diagnostic method among them evaluating the significance of different results. The multidisciplinary approach significantly reduced the number of unidentified neck lesions. The analysis demonstrates the need to better define the scan protocols and compose forensic guidelines for radiological application. The results of this study point out the need to compare the different diagnostic approaches in deceased subjects to better define the radiological scan protocol based on a multidisciplinary approach, including autopsy and radiological methods and the radiological scan protocols. Methods: We performed a systematic electronic search of retrospective scientific articles in PubMed, the Scopus database, and the Cochrane Library. The following combinations of words were used: "hyoid fracture"; "comparison between PMCT AND autopsy"; "hyoid fracture PMCT AND autopsy"; "hyoid bone fracture AND forensic imaging"; "hyoid fracture AND PMCT"; "neck fracture PMCT AND autopsy"; "laryngohyoid lesions"; "postmortem CT AND autopsy in strangulation"; "postmortem AND strangulation Signs "; "strangulation virtopsy"; and "strangulation AND MRI". We selected 16 articles that were published between March 2003 and June 2020. We conducted a meta-analysis with R software to evaluate the rates. We obtained related confidence intervals and a forest plot. Results: Thyroid cartilage damages were significantly more common than hyoid bone fractures (61.7% vs 42.2%) in a sample of 128 subjects. The synergic uses of autopsy/PMCT, autopsy/PMFP, autopsy/microCT, and autopsy/PMMR revealed significantly higher rates than a single investigation. We analyzed the PMCT scan data. The scan parameters evaluated were as follows: row, scan sample, reconstruction, kernel, slice thickness, kVp, and mAs. A lack of uniformity in the application of the protocol was observed. Conclusion: Further studies are needed to better define the radiological scan protocols and to draw guidelines to identify the appropriate radiological methods in relation to the specific case.