In this contribution we present a research aimed at studying the effectiveness of two workshops in improving reasoning skills in undergraduate students. Both the workshops are based on the Feynman Unifying Approach. A questionnaire containing six open-ended questions on the temperature dependence of evaporation of a liquid and of a chemical reaction was administered to the students of both groups before instruction. A second one, similar to the first but focused on a physical content different from both the pre-instruction test one and the content dealt with during the workshops, was administered after instruction. The responses to the pre- and post-instruction questionnaires are analyzed by using Not-Hierarchical Cluster Analysis methods and students’ lines of reasoning about the proposed phenomena/situations are inferred in both the experimental and the control group. The implications on the efficacy of the two workshops in improving student explicative skills are discussed.
Onofrio Rosario Battaglia, B.D.P. (2018). A quantitative analysis of university student reasoning lines in the field of thermally activated phenomena. JOURNAL OF PHYSICS. CONFERENCE SERIES, 1076(1), 012019-1-012019-13 [10.1088/1742-6596/1076/1/012019].
A quantitative analysis of university student reasoning lines in the field of thermally activated phenomena
Onofrio Rosario Battaglia;Benedetto Di Paola;Claudio Fazio;Nicola Pizzolato;Dominique Persano Adorno
2018-01-01
Abstract
In this contribution we present a research aimed at studying the effectiveness of two workshops in improving reasoning skills in undergraduate students. Both the workshops are based on the Feynman Unifying Approach. A questionnaire containing six open-ended questions on the temperature dependence of evaporation of a liquid and of a chemical reaction was administered to the students of both groups before instruction. A second one, similar to the first but focused on a physical content different from both the pre-instruction test one and the content dealt with during the workshops, was administered after instruction. The responses to the pre- and post-instruction questionnaires are analyzed by using Not-Hierarchical Cluster Analysis methods and students’ lines of reasoning about the proposed phenomena/situations are inferred in both the experimental and the control group. The implications on the efficacy of the two workshops in improving student explicative skills are discussed.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
A_quantitative_analysis_of_university_student_reas.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo principale
Dimensione
658.03 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
658.03 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.