This paper builds on a previous study concerning the assessment and ranking of Project Management Information Systems (PMISs) features and the comparison of a PMISs software sample. In such an application a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) tool such as the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was adopted to get the ranking by neglecting the mutual influence of elements within the structure. The present paper aims at taking into account such influences by relying on the Analytic Network Process (ANP) for the assessment and ranking of features, while the PMISs software assessment has been performed through the AHP via the direct assessment.
Muriana, C., Enea, M. (2014). Application of multi-criteria decision making to PMISs assessment. In 21st Conference Euroma OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT IN AN INNOVATION ECONOMY (pp.1-10).
Application of multi-criteria decision making to PMISs assessment
MURIANA, Cinzia;ENEA, Mario
2014-01-01
Abstract
This paper builds on a previous study concerning the assessment and ranking of Project Management Information Systems (PMISs) features and the comparison of a PMISs software sample. In such an application a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) tool such as the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was adopted to get the ranking by neglecting the mutual influence of elements within the structure. The present paper aims at taking into account such influences by relying on the Analytic Network Process (ANP) for the assessment and ranking of features, while the PMISs software assessment has been performed through the AHP via the direct assessment.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
PRJ-04.pdf
Solo gestori archvio
Descrizione: Paper
Dimensione
108.69 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
108.69 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
