This article examines how the growing use of economic lawfare has influenced the evolution of BRICS cooperation and assesses whether the group’s institutional responses are contributing to a more diversified international economic order. It argues that sanctions, export controls and other coercive economic measures have not merely constrained several BRICS members but have accelerated pre-existing efforts to develop alternative mechanisms of financial, monetary and commercial cooperation. The analysis adopts a qualitative legal and geopolitical approach, combining the literature on economic lawfare and weaponized interdependence with the examination of BRICS declarations, institutional documents and recent policy developments. Particular attention is devoted to five interconnected dimensions of institutional adaptation: alternative payment systems, BRICS financial institutions, de-dollarization, intra-BRICS trade and economic engagement with sanctioned states. The article concludes that BRICS are not seeking to overturn the current international economic order but to diversify it through a process of institutional layering in which new arrangements coexist with established institutions. Economic lawfare has therefore acted less as a constraint than as a catalyst for institutional innovation, strengthening the BRICS’ role as an increasingly influential platform of South-South cooperation within a progressively more multipolar global economy.

Bono, M. (2026). Lawfare, Institutional Adaptation and the BRICS: Towards a More Diversified International Economic Order. In I. Castellucci, F. Ruschi, S. Zolea (a cura di), Law in a Divided World. Geolegal readings of post-globalisation (pp. 57-83).

Lawfare, Institutional Adaptation and the BRICS: Towards a More Diversified International Economic Order

Bono Marta
2026-09-01

Abstract

This article examines how the growing use of economic lawfare has influenced the evolution of BRICS cooperation and assesses whether the group’s institutional responses are contributing to a more diversified international economic order. It argues that sanctions, export controls and other coercive economic measures have not merely constrained several BRICS members but have accelerated pre-existing efforts to develop alternative mechanisms of financial, monetary and commercial cooperation. The analysis adopts a qualitative legal and geopolitical approach, combining the literature on economic lawfare and weaponized interdependence with the examination of BRICS declarations, institutional documents and recent policy developments. Particular attention is devoted to five interconnected dimensions of institutional adaptation: alternative payment systems, BRICS financial institutions, de-dollarization, intra-BRICS trade and economic engagement with sanctioned states. The article concludes that BRICS are not seeking to overturn the current international economic order but to diversify it through a process of institutional layering in which new arrangements coexist with established institutions. Economic lawfare has therefore acted less as a constraint than as a catalyst for institutional innovation, strengthening the BRICS’ role as an increasingly influential platform of South-South cooperation within a progressively more multipolar global economy.
set-2026
Settore GIUR-09/A - Diritto internazionale
9791282745024
Bono, M. (2026). Lawfare, Institutional Adaptation and the BRICS: Towards a More Diversified International Economic Order. In I. Castellucci, F. Ruschi, S. Zolea (a cura di), Law in a Divided World. Geolegal readings of post-globalisation (pp. 57-83).
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Fucina XXVIII (5)-59-85.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 842.6 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
842.6 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/717567
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact