Introduzione. Psychological ownership (PO) has gained prominence in organizational psychology, yet literature remains fragmented, limiting comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon. Obiettivi. This research proposes a circumplex model of psychological ownership based on two axes: cognitive vs affective; promotive vs preventive. Crossing these axes yields four ownership forms: Proud (promotive-affective), Efficacious (promotive-cognitive), Protective (preventive-affective), and Secured (preventive-cognitive), each generating different organizational outcomes. Metodo. Two longitudinal studies were conducted. Study 1 employed ipsative measurement across five organizational domains (brand, work objects, professional role, work group, organization). Study 2 used Likert-scale measures and included convergent validity scales (organizational identification, commitment, attachment, job insecurity, territoriality). Risultati. Study 1 supported the three-factor circumplex structure (excluding Protective due to ipsative constraints) with adequate model fit (χ²(77) = 284.04; RMSEA = .087; CFI = .811; SRMR = .065). Factor correlations aligned with theoretical predictions: Proud and Efficacious showed a moderate positive correlation (r = .554), while Secured correlated negatively with both (r = -.862 and r = -.835). Study 2 confirmed convergent-discriminant validity, with ownership factors displaying expected relationships in most cases, and cluster analysis revealing four distinct profiles with unique patterns across criterion variables. However, the Likert-format CFA warrants further investigation: the near-perfect Proud– Efficacious correlation (r = .937) and low AVE for Efficacious suggest multiple factorial solutions may be plausible, indicating the need for item revision and model comparison before drawing definitive conclusions about the four-factor structure in normative formats. Limiti. Ipsative methodology required omitting Protective ownership from simultaneous analysis. The sample was limited to specific organizational contexts, potentially affecting generalizability. Aspetti innovativi. This circumplex model provides the first integrated framework explaining psychological ownership's multifaceted nature, offering theoretical coherence and practical implications for organizational interventions targeting specific ownership orientations.

Di Stefano, G., Ambrosetti, A., Giordano, M. (2026). Psychological Ownership: proposta di un modello circomplesso. In Comitato scientifico (a cura di), L'adiacente possibile (pp. 17-17).

Psychological Ownership: proposta di un modello circomplesso

Di Stefano Giovanni
Primo
Conceptualization
;
Ambrosetti Alice
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
2026-01-01

Abstract

Introduzione. Psychological ownership (PO) has gained prominence in organizational psychology, yet literature remains fragmented, limiting comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon. Obiettivi. This research proposes a circumplex model of psychological ownership based on two axes: cognitive vs affective; promotive vs preventive. Crossing these axes yields four ownership forms: Proud (promotive-affective), Efficacious (promotive-cognitive), Protective (preventive-affective), and Secured (preventive-cognitive), each generating different organizational outcomes. Metodo. Two longitudinal studies were conducted. Study 1 employed ipsative measurement across five organizational domains (brand, work objects, professional role, work group, organization). Study 2 used Likert-scale measures and included convergent validity scales (organizational identification, commitment, attachment, job insecurity, territoriality). Risultati. Study 1 supported the three-factor circumplex structure (excluding Protective due to ipsative constraints) with adequate model fit (χ²(77) = 284.04; RMSEA = .087; CFI = .811; SRMR = .065). Factor correlations aligned with theoretical predictions: Proud and Efficacious showed a moderate positive correlation (r = .554), while Secured correlated negatively with both (r = -.862 and r = -.835). Study 2 confirmed convergent-discriminant validity, with ownership factors displaying expected relationships in most cases, and cluster analysis revealing four distinct profiles with unique patterns across criterion variables. However, the Likert-format CFA warrants further investigation: the near-perfect Proud– Efficacious correlation (r = .937) and low AVE for Efficacious suggest multiple factorial solutions may be plausible, indicating the need for item revision and model comparison before drawing definitive conclusions about the four-factor structure in normative formats. Limiti. Ipsative methodology required omitting Protective ownership from simultaneous analysis. The sample was limited to specific organizational contexts, potentially affecting generalizability. Aspetti innovativi. This circumplex model provides the first integrated framework explaining psychological ownership's multifaceted nature, offering theoretical coherence and practical implications for organizational interventions targeting specific ownership orientations.
2026
psychological ownership, circumplex model, ipsative measurement
Di Stefano, G., Ambrosetti, A., Giordano, M. (2026). Psychological Ownership: proposta di un modello circomplesso. In Comitato scientifico (a cura di), L'adiacente possibile (pp. 17-17).
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
abstract-aip-2026.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Descrizione: abstract
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 2.43 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.43 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/715703
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact