In this work, two variants of solid-state friction-based additive processes, Friction Surfacing Deposition and Friction Stir Additive Manufacturing, were compared in terms of their environmental impact. A comparative Life Cycle Assessment analysis was performed, alongside experimental quantification and analysis of energy and resource flows for each process. The energy analysis revealed that the friction stir additive manufacturing is a more energy-consuming technology than surfacing process due to the significantly lower tool feed rate required to produce sound welds. It was determined that the most significant contributor to the environmental impact of both methods is the process scrap. Strategies to reduce material waste were proposed for each technology, tailored to the specific characteristics of their implementation. Furthermore, an additional LCA model was developed to evaluate strategies for minimizing FSAM process scrap.
Amantia, S., Kalashnikov, K., Ingarao, G., Di Lorenzo, R., Buffa, G., Fratini, L. (2025). Comparative Environmental Impact Analysis of Friction-based Additive Manufacturing Techniques. In Procedia CIRP, Volume 135, 32nd CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering (LCE 2025) (pp. 456-461). Elsevier B.V. [10.1016/j.procir.2024.12.043].
Comparative Environmental Impact Analysis of Friction-based Additive Manufacturing Techniques
Amantia S.;Kalashnikov K.;Ingarao Giuseppe
;Di Lorenzo Rosa;Buffa Gianluca;Fratini L.
2025-01-01
Abstract
In this work, two variants of solid-state friction-based additive processes, Friction Surfacing Deposition and Friction Stir Additive Manufacturing, were compared in terms of their environmental impact. A comparative Life Cycle Assessment analysis was performed, alongside experimental quantification and analysis of energy and resource flows for each process. The energy analysis revealed that the friction stir additive manufacturing is a more energy-consuming technology than surfacing process due to the significantly lower tool feed rate required to produce sound welds. It was determined that the most significant contributor to the environmental impact of both methods is the process scrap. Strategies to reduce material waste were proposed for each technology, tailored to the specific characteristics of their implementation. Furthermore, an additional LCA model was developed to evaluate strategies for minimizing FSAM process scrap.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-s2.0-S2212827125003026-main.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
799.96 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
799.96 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


