The feasibility of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been investigated by in-silico modeling to assist clinicians in the pre-operative planning of the device implantation. However, a rigorous standardization is needed to improve the reliability and effectiveness of the in-silico model. This study aims to verify and validate a structural finite-element model of TAVI using the ASME V&V40 protocol. After defining the context of use (COU) and model risk, verification activities were carried out for the computational model of the human aortic root as obtained from a cohort of twenty patients with TAVI. Validation involved comparing numerical predictions with post-procedural CT imaging measurements of both the aortic strain and valve orifice area at systole. Results demonstrated that the relative error between simulations and actual CT measurements ranged from 8.6% to 13.6% for the systolic strain whilst the calcific aortic valve presented differences in the range of 0.08% to 11.86%. This study presents a flexible and customizable framework for assessing the credibility of patient-specific modeling in TAVI patients, emphasizing the critical role of establishing credibility in the response of in-silico models.

Catalano C., Turgut T., Zhalka O., Gotzen N., Cannata S., Gentile G., et al. (2024). Establishing In-silico Credibility of Patient-Specific Finite-Element Model in a Virtual Cohort. In Establishing In-silico Credibility of Patient-Specific Finite-Element Model in a Virtual Cohort (pp. 311-318). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. [10.1007/978-3-031-55315-8_34].

Establishing In-silico Credibility of Patient-Specific Finite-Element Model in a Virtual Cohort

Catalano C.;Agnese V.;Pasta S.
2024-01-01

Abstract

The feasibility of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been investigated by in-silico modeling to assist clinicians in the pre-operative planning of the device implantation. However, a rigorous standardization is needed to improve the reliability and effectiveness of the in-silico model. This study aims to verify and validate a structural finite-element model of TAVI using the ASME V&V40 protocol. After defining the context of use (COU) and model risk, verification activities were carried out for the computational model of the human aortic root as obtained from a cohort of twenty patients with TAVI. Validation involved comparing numerical predictions with post-procedural CT imaging measurements of both the aortic strain and valve orifice area at systole. Results demonstrated that the relative error between simulations and actual CT measurements ranged from 8.6% to 13.6% for the systolic strain whilst the calcific aortic valve presented differences in the range of 0.08% to 11.86%. This study presents a flexible and customizable framework for assessing the credibility of patient-specific modeling in TAVI patients, emphasizing the critical role of establishing credibility in the response of in-silico models.
2024
Settore ING-IND/34 - Bioingegneria Industriale
9783031553141
9783031553158
Catalano C., Turgut T., Zhalka O., Gotzen N., Cannata S., Gentile G., et al. (2024). Establishing In-silico Credibility of Patient-Specific Finite-Element Model in a Virtual Cohort. In Establishing In-silico Credibility of Patient-Specific Finite-Element Model in a Virtual Cohort (pp. 311-318). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. [10.1007/978-3-031-55315-8_34].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
splnproc1703_CC.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Tipologia: Post-print
Dimensione 265.44 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
265.44 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
978-3-031-55315-8_34.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 392.75 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
392.75 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/636094
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact