Nowadays the production of traditional building materials continues to be highly energy consuming and polluting. Therefore, the development of sustainable materials that allow the reuse of industrial waste could lead to a faster ecological transition of the construction industry. Among lab-scale developed materials, geopolymers are widely recognized as a future and sustainable alternative to traditional Portland cement, allowing to reuse various wastes from different industrial sectors. This paper aims to perform an environmental analysis of geopolymers large-scale production based on the use of red mud, a waste product from the aluminum supply chain. Previous studies on red mud-based geopolymers have focused mainly on optimizing the laboratory formulations, without analyzing their real environmental advantage over traditional building materials. Therefore, this study uses the life cycle assessment approach to verify the environmental benefit of the large-scale production for the circular economy. Starting from the literature analysis, a four-steps scale-up procedure was applied to identify a potential industrial production. Results showed a clear reduction in CO2 emissions compared to the production of conventional Portland cement and highlighted the need to reduce the use of alkaline activators in geopolymers production. © 2023, IFIP International Federation for Information Processing.

Adelfio L., Sgarbossa F., Leone R., La Scalia G. (2023). Life Cycle Assessment of Red Mud-Based Geopolymer Production at Industrial Scale. In IFIP Advances in Information and Communication TechnologyVolume 692 AICT, Pages 593 - 6062023 IFIP WG (pp. 593-606). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH [10.1007/978-3-031-43688-8_41].

Life Cycle Assessment of Red Mud-Based Geopolymer Production at Industrial Scale

Adelfio L.;Leone R.;La Scalia G.
2023-09-14

Abstract

Nowadays the production of traditional building materials continues to be highly energy consuming and polluting. Therefore, the development of sustainable materials that allow the reuse of industrial waste could lead to a faster ecological transition of the construction industry. Among lab-scale developed materials, geopolymers are widely recognized as a future and sustainable alternative to traditional Portland cement, allowing to reuse various wastes from different industrial sectors. This paper aims to perform an environmental analysis of geopolymers large-scale production based on the use of red mud, a waste product from the aluminum supply chain. Previous studies on red mud-based geopolymers have focused mainly on optimizing the laboratory formulations, without analyzing their real environmental advantage over traditional building materials. Therefore, this study uses the life cycle assessment approach to verify the environmental benefit of the large-scale production for the circular economy. Starting from the literature analysis, a four-steps scale-up procedure was applied to identify a potential industrial production. Results showed a clear reduction in CO2 emissions compared to the production of conventional Portland cement and highlighted the need to reduce the use of alkaline activators in geopolymers production. © 2023, IFIP International Federation for Information Processing.
14-set-2023
978-3-031-43687-1
978-3-031-43688-8
Adelfio L., Sgarbossa F., Leone R., La Scalia G. (2023). Life Cycle Assessment of Red Mud-Based Geopolymer Production at Industrial Scale. In IFIP Advances in Information and Communication TechnologyVolume 692 AICT, Pages 593 - 6062023 IFIP WG (pp. 593-606). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH [10.1007/978-3-031-43688-8_41].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
978-3-031-43688-8_41.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 446.69 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
446.69 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/616033
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact