This paper is a response to Piombino-Mascali and Zink’s accusations against our investigation into the story of the research on the Sleeping Beauty of Palermo, the mummy of Rosalia Lombardo (1918-1920). A point-by-point rebuttal shows how their original work was not conducted to the highest scientific standards. They do not report important data and so avoid proper oversight. As a result the paleopathological community cannot be satisfied that their conclusions are robust.
Bianucci, R., Donell, S.T., Galassi, F.M., Lanza, T., Mattutino, G., Nerlich, A.G., et al. (2023). On the embalmer Alfredo Salafia (1869-1933) and the mummy of Rosalia Lombardo (1918-1920): science is not a narrative. HUMAN EVOLUTION, 38(1-2), 37-45 [10.14673/HE2023121112].
On the embalmer Alfredo Salafia (1869-1933) and the mummy of Rosalia Lombardo (1918-1920): science is not a narrative
Bianucci R.
Primo
Conceptualization
;Sineo L.Ultimo
Investigation
2023-06-30
Abstract
This paper is a response to Piombino-Mascali and Zink’s accusations against our investigation into the story of the research on the Sleeping Beauty of Palermo, the mummy of Rosalia Lombardo (1918-1920). A point-by-point rebuttal shows how their original work was not conducted to the highest scientific standards. They do not report important data and so avoid proper oversight. As a result the paleopathological community cannot be satisfied that their conclusions are robust.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Bianucci et al. 2023 Salafia rebuttal DPM_ARZ.pdf
Solo gestori archvio
Descrizione: article
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
301.56 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
301.56 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
