This paper is a response to Piombino-Mascali and Zink’s accusations against our investigation into the story of the research on the Sleeping Beauty of Palermo, the mummy of Rosalia Lombardo (1918-1920). A point-by-point rebuttal shows how their original work was not conducted to the highest scientific standards. They do not report important data and so avoid proper oversight. As a result the paleopathological community cannot be satisfied that their conclusions are robust.
Bianucci R., D.S. (2023). On the embalmer Alfredo Salafia (1869-1933) and the mummy of Rosalia Lombardo (1918-1920): science is not a narrative. HUMAN EVOLUTION, 38(1-2), 37-45 [10.14673/HE2023121112].
On the embalmer Alfredo Salafia (1869-1933) and the mummy of Rosalia Lombardo (1918-1920): science is not a narrative
Bianucci R.
Primo
Conceptualization
;Sineo L.Ultimo
Investigation
2023-06-30
Abstract
This paper is a response to Piombino-Mascali and Zink’s accusations against our investigation into the story of the research on the Sleeping Beauty of Palermo, the mummy of Rosalia Lombardo (1918-1920). A point-by-point rebuttal shows how their original work was not conducted to the highest scientific standards. They do not report important data and so avoid proper oversight. As a result the paleopathological community cannot be satisfied that their conclusions are robust.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Bianucci et al. 2023 Salafia rebuttal DPM_ARZ.pdf
Solo gestori archvio
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
301.56 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
301.56 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
