An important molecular target for metastatic CRC treatment is the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Many potential biomarkers predictive of response to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (cetuximab and panitumumab) have been retrospectively evaluated, including EGFR activation markers and EGFR ligands activation markers. With regard to the "negative predictive factors" responsible for primary or intrinsic resistance to anti-EGFR antibodies a lot of data are now available. Among these, KRAS mutations have emerged as a major predictor of resistance to panitumumab or cetuximab in the clinical setting and several studies of patients receiving first and subsequent lines of treatment have shown that those with tumors carrying KRAS mutations do not respond to EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibodies or show any survival benefit from such treatments. The role of B-RAF mutations, mutually exclusive with KRAS mutations, in predicting resistance to anti-EGFR mAbs is not yet consolidated. It therefore appears that BRAF mutations may play a strong negative prognostic role and only a slight role in resistance to anti-EGFR Abs.

Rizzo, S., Bronte, G., Fanale, D., Corsini, L.R., Silvestris, N., Santini, D., et al. (2010). Prognostic vs predictive molecular biomarkers in colorectal cancer: is KRAS and BRAF wild type status required for anti-EGFR therapy?. CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 36(suppl.3), 56-61 [10.1016/S0305-7372(10)70021-9].

Prognostic vs predictive molecular biomarkers in colorectal cancer: is KRAS and BRAF wild type status required for anti-EGFR therapy?

RIZZO, Sergio;BRONTE, Giuseppe;FANALE, Daniele;CORSINI, Lidia Rita;GULOTTA, Gaspare;BAZAN, Viviana;GEBBIA, Nicolo';FULFARO, Fabio;RUSSO, Antonio
2010-01-01

Abstract

An important molecular target for metastatic CRC treatment is the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Many potential biomarkers predictive of response to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (cetuximab and panitumumab) have been retrospectively evaluated, including EGFR activation markers and EGFR ligands activation markers. With regard to the "negative predictive factors" responsible for primary or intrinsic resistance to anti-EGFR antibodies a lot of data are now available. Among these, KRAS mutations have emerged as a major predictor of resistance to panitumumab or cetuximab in the clinical setting and several studies of patients receiving first and subsequent lines of treatment have shown that those with tumors carrying KRAS mutations do not respond to EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibodies or show any survival benefit from such treatments. The role of B-RAF mutations, mutually exclusive with KRAS mutations, in predicting resistance to anti-EGFR mAbs is not yet consolidated. It therefore appears that BRAF mutations may play a strong negative prognostic role and only a slight role in resistance to anti-EGFR Abs.
2010
Rizzo, S., Bronte, G., Fanale, D., Corsini, L.R., Silvestris, N., Santini, D., et al. (2010). Prognostic vs predictive molecular biomarkers in colorectal cancer: is KRAS and BRAF wild type status required for anti-EGFR therapy?. CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 36(suppl.3), 56-61 [10.1016/S0305-7372(10)70021-9].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Prognostic vs predictive molecular biomarkers in colorectal cancer.pdf

accesso aperto

Dimensione 227.05 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
227.05 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/59677
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 34
  • Scopus 95
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 85
social impact