Welds are currently only inspected after all the passes are complete and after allowing sufficient time for any hydrogen cracking to develop, typically over several days. Any defects introduced between passes are therefore unreported until fully buried, greatly complicating rework and also delaying early corrections to the weld process parameters. In-process inspection can provide early intervention but involves many challenges, including operation at high temperatures with significant gradients affecting acoustic velocities and, hence, beam directions. Reflections from the incomplete parts of the weld would also be flagged as lack-of-fusion defects, requiring the region of interest (ROI) to adapt as the weld is built up. The collaborative SIMPLE (SIngle Manufacturing PLatform Environment) project addresses these challenges by incorporating robotic inspection within a robotic tungsten inert gas (TIG) welding cell. This has been accomplished initially with commercial off-the-shelf ultrasonic phased arrays, but is flexible enough to adapt to future developments with solutions suitable for higher temperatures. The welding and inspection robots operate autonomously. The former can introduce deliberate defects to validate the latter, which uses 5 MHz 64-element phased arrays on high-temperature wedges to generate sector scans after each weld pass. The results are presented, confirming that the challenges have been addressed and demonstrating the feasibility of this approach.

Lines D.I., Javadi Y., Mohseni E., Vasilev M., MacLeod C.N., Mineo C., et al. (2020). A flexible robotic cell for in-process inspection of multi-pass welds. INSIGHT, 92(9), 526-532 [10.1784/insi.2020.62.9.526].

A flexible robotic cell for in-process inspection of multi-pass welds

Mineo C.;
2020-09-01

Abstract

Welds are currently only inspected after all the passes are complete and after allowing sufficient time for any hydrogen cracking to develop, typically over several days. Any defects introduced between passes are therefore unreported until fully buried, greatly complicating rework and also delaying early corrections to the weld process parameters. In-process inspection can provide early intervention but involves many challenges, including operation at high temperatures with significant gradients affecting acoustic velocities and, hence, beam directions. Reflections from the incomplete parts of the weld would also be flagged as lack-of-fusion defects, requiring the region of interest (ROI) to adapt as the weld is built up. The collaborative SIMPLE (SIngle Manufacturing PLatform Environment) project addresses these challenges by incorporating robotic inspection within a robotic tungsten inert gas (TIG) welding cell. This has been accomplished initially with commercial off-the-shelf ultrasonic phased arrays, but is flexible enough to adapt to future developments with solutions suitable for higher temperatures. The welding and inspection robots operate autonomously. The former can introduce deliberate defects to validate the latter, which uses 5 MHz 64-element phased arrays on high-temperature wedges to generate sector scans after each weld pass. The results are presented, confirming that the challenges have been addressed and demonstrating the feasibility of this approach.
set-2020
Lines D.I., Javadi Y., Mohseni E., Vasilev M., MacLeod C.N., Mineo C., et al. (2020). A flexible robotic cell for in-process inspection of multi-pass welds. INSIGHT, 92(9), 526-532 [10.1784/insi.2020.62.9.526].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s4.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 3.7 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.7 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Lines_etal_Insight_2020_A_flexible_robotic_cell_for_in_process.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Post-print
Dimensione 947.32 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
947.32 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/435288
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact