This chapter analyzes the philosophical implications related to the “position of vulnerability” defined by the Directive 2011/36/EU on Preventing and Combating Trafficking in Human Beings and Protecting its Victims as “a situation in which the person concerned has no real or acceptable alternative but to submit to the abuse involved” (art. 2.2). In particular, the chapter focuses on the “choice” made by migrant women employed in care and domestic work and in the agricultural sector in Italy. The Italian labor market is marked by the exploitation of migrant women, especially women from Romania, due to social, economic and legal factors that will be considered from a gender perspective. Women’s rights violations often have significant consequences for the effective protection of children’s rights. The “choice” of these women with respect to their decision to emigrate and their “consent” to exploitative working and living conditions are explored by drawing on interviews collected in Sicily and Venice between 2014 and 2016. Different paradigms of “choice” and “adaptive preference” are analyzed to identify a theoretical model that can grasp these migrant women’s experience. On the basis of the analysis, the last section focuses on the actors responsible for the violation of the rights of migrant women and their children within the Italian labor market.

Sciurba, A. (2019). Vulnerability, freedom of choice and structural global injustice: The “consent” to exploitation of migrant women workers. In Juan Carlos Velasco, Maria Caterina La Barbera (a cura di), Challenging the Borders of Justice in the Age of Migrations (pp. 225-241). Springer.

Vulnerability, freedom of choice and structural global injustice: The “consent” to exploitation of migrant women workers

Sciurba, Alessandra
2019-01-01

Abstract

This chapter analyzes the philosophical implications related to the “position of vulnerability” defined by the Directive 2011/36/EU on Preventing and Combating Trafficking in Human Beings and Protecting its Victims as “a situation in which the person concerned has no real or acceptable alternative but to submit to the abuse involved” (art. 2.2). In particular, the chapter focuses on the “choice” made by migrant women employed in care and domestic work and in the agricultural sector in Italy. The Italian labor market is marked by the exploitation of migrant women, especially women from Romania, due to social, economic and legal factors that will be considered from a gender perspective. Women’s rights violations often have significant consequences for the effective protection of children’s rights. The “choice” of these women with respect to their decision to emigrate and their “consent” to exploitative working and living conditions are explored by drawing on interviews collected in Sicily and Venice between 2014 and 2016. Different paradigms of “choice” and “adaptive preference” are analyzed to identify a theoretical model that can grasp these migrant women’s experience. On the basis of the analysis, the last section focuses on the actors responsible for the violation of the rights of migrant women and their children within the Italian labor market.
2019
Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del Diritto
Sciurba, A. (2019). Vulnerability, freedom of choice and structural global injustice: The “consent” to exploitation of migrant women workers. In Juan Carlos Velasco, Maria Caterina La Barbera (a cura di), Challenging the Borders of Justice in the Age of Migrations (pp. 225-241). Springer.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
6.Vulnerability_Freedom_of_Choice_Structural_Global_Injustice.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Post-print
Dimensione 2.23 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.23 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/414434
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact