Background. Hemostasis during thyroidectomy is essential; however, the safest, most efficient, and most cost-effective way to achieve this is unclear. This randomized, multicenter, single-blind, prospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of using different hemostatic approaches in patients undergoing total thyroidectomy. Methods. Patients aged ≥18 to 70 years were randomized to Floseal + a harmonic scalpel (HS), Floseal alone, HS alone, or standard total thyroidectomy. Primary endpoint was 24-hour drain output. Secondary endpoints included surgery duration and complications. Results. Two hundred and six patients were randomized to Floseal + HS (n = 52), Floseal alone (n = 54), HS alone (n = 50), and standard total thyroidectomy (n = 50). The 24-hour drain output was lower in the Floseal + HS group compared with standard thyroidectomy. Floseal + HS also had a shorter surgery time (P <.0001) versus the other 3 treatments. Conclusion. Floseal + HS can be effective at reducing postsurgical drain output and provides a complementary hemostatic approach in patients undergoing total thyroidectomy.
Docimo G., Tolone S., Conzo G., Limongelli P., Del Genio G., Parmeggiani D., et al. (2016). A gelatin-thrombin matrix topical hemostatic agent (Floseal) in combination with harmonic scalpel is effective in patients undergoing total thyroidectomy: A prospective, multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial. SURGICAL INNOVATION, 23(1), 23-29.
Data di pubblicazione: | 2016 |
Titolo: | A gelatin-thrombin matrix topical hemostatic agent (Floseal) in combination with harmonic scalpel is effective in patients undergoing total thyroidectomy: A prospective, multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial |
Autori: | |
Citazione: | Docimo G., Tolone S., Conzo G., Limongelli P., Del Genio G., Parmeggiani D., et al. (2016). A gelatin-thrombin matrix topical hemostatic agent (Floseal) in combination with harmonic scalpel is effective in patients undergoing total thyroidectomy: A prospective, multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial. SURGICAL INNOVATION, 23(1), 23-29. |
Rivista: | |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): | http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1553350615596638 |
Abstract: | Background. Hemostasis during thyroidectomy is essential; however, the safest, most efficient, and most cost-effective way to achieve this is unclear. This randomized, multicenter, single-blind, prospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of using different hemostatic approaches in patients undergoing total thyroidectomy. Methods. Patients aged ≥18 to 70 years were randomized to Floseal + a harmonic scalpel (HS), Floseal alone, HS alone, or standard total thyroidectomy. Primary endpoint was 24-hour drain output. Secondary endpoints included surgery duration and complications. Results. Two hundred and six patients were randomized to Floseal + HS (n = 52), Floseal alone (n = 54), HS alone (n = 50), and standard total thyroidectomy (n = 50). The 24-hour drain output was lower in the Floseal + HS group compared with standard thyroidectomy. Floseal + HS also had a shorter surgery time (P <.0001) versus the other 3 treatments. Conclusion. Floseal + HS can be effective at reducing postsurgical drain output and provides a complementary hemostatic approach in patients undergoing total thyroidectomy. |
Appare nelle tipologie: | 1.01 Articolo in rivista |
File in questo prodotto:
File | Descrizione | Tipologia | Licenza | |
---|---|---|---|---|
floseal in tiroidectomia.pdf | Versione Editoriale | Administrator Richiedi una copia |