The author proposes a new interpretation of the well-known Ulpian’s and Pedius’ words contained in D. 2.14.1.3, which is based on the idea that ‘conventio’, despite its common assumption as equivalent of ‘consensus’ (in the abstract sense of subjective element of a contract), rather alludes to the content of the ‘consensus’ as the objective result of a coinciding perception and will (‘in idem sentire’) between the contracting parties.
FALCONE, G. (2019). Riflessioni sulla conventio in D. 2.14.1.3. ANNALI DEL SEMINARIO GIURIDICO, 62, 195-218.
Riflessioni sulla conventio in D. 2.14.1.3
FALCONE, G
2019-01-01
Abstract
The author proposes a new interpretation of the well-known Ulpian’s and Pedius’ words contained in D. 2.14.1.3, which is based on the idea that ‘conventio’, despite its common assumption as equivalent of ‘consensus’ (in the abstract sense of subjective element of a contract), rather alludes to the content of the ‘consensus’ as the objective result of a coinciding perception and will (‘in idem sentire’) between the contracting parties.
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Riflessioni sulla conventio in D. 2.14.1.3.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
2.91 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.91 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
