The author proposes a new interpretation of the well-known Ulpian’s and Pedius’ words contained in D. 2.14.1.3, which is based on the idea that ‘conventio’, despite its common assumption as equivalent of ‘consensus’ (in the abstract sense of subjective element of a contract), rather alludes to the content of the ‘consensus’ as the objective result of a coinciding perception and will (‘in idem sentire’) between the contracting parties.
FALCONE, G. (2019). Riflessioni sulla conventio in D. 2.14.1.3. ANNALI DEL SEMINARIO GIURIDICO, 62, 195-218.
Data di pubblicazione: | 2019 | |
Titolo: | Riflessioni sulla conventio in D. 2.14.1.3 | |
Autori: | FALCONE, Giuseppe (Corresponding) | |
Citazione: | FALCONE, G. (2019). Riflessioni sulla conventio in D. 2.14.1.3. ANNALI DEL SEMINARIO GIURIDICO, 62, 195-218. | |
Rivista: | ||
Abstract: | The author proposes a new interpretation of the well-known Ulpian’s and Pedius’ words contained in D. 2.14.1.3, which is based on the idea that ‘conventio’, despite its common assumption as equivalent of ‘consensus’ (in the abstract sense of subjective element of a contract), rather alludes to the content of the ‘consensus’ as the objective result of a coinciding perception and will (‘in idem sentire’) between the contracting parties. | |
Settore Scientifico Disciplinare: | Settore IUS/18 - Diritto Romano E Diritti Dell'Antichita' | |
Appare nelle tipologie: | 1.01 Articolo in rivista |
File in questo prodotto:
File | Descrizione | Tipologia | Licenza | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Riflessioni sulla conventio in D. 2.14.1.3.pdf | Versione Editoriale | Open Access Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.