Archivio istituzionale della ricerca dell'Università degli Studi di Palermo
IRIS è il sistema di gestione integrata dei dati della ricerca (persone, pubblicazioni, progetti, attività) adottato dall’Università di Palermo, e ha lo scopo di raccogliere, conservare, documentare, e diffondere ad accesso aperto le informazioni relative alla produzione scientifica degli autori afferenti all’Ateneo.
EnglishStudy Objective. To compare two procedures for endometrial resection: resectoscopy with monopolar knife versus resectoscopy with bipolar knife. Patients and methods. 76 perimenopausal patients affected by DUB (Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding), no longer wishing to remain pregnant and having failed to respond to pharmacological treatment, underwent endometrial ablation with monopolar loop (group A: 38 women) or bipolar loop (group B: 38 women). Operative parameters, complication rate, menstrual outcome were considered. Results. Operative time was no different between groups. The amount of distention fluid adsorbed was significantly higher in group A than in group B, and late cumulative complication rate was 44% in group A and 24% in group B. Menstrual cycle was, overall, controlled in both groups. Conclusions. Bipolar electrode is as effective as monopolar electrode for endometrial resection, but was safer than monopolar knife
DE FRANCISCIS, P., Perino, A., Calagna, G., Corbisiero, F., Tiberio, F., Matteo, M., et al. (2013). Impact of monopolar and bipolar endometrial resection on abnormal uterine bleeding. GIORNALE ITALIANO DI OSTETRICIA E GINECOLOGIA, 35(6), 749-753 [10.11138/giog/2013.35.6.749].
| Data di pubblicazione: | 2013 | |
| Titolo: | Impact of monopolar and bipolar endometrial resection on abnormal uterine bleeding | |
| Autori: | ||
| Citazione: | DE FRANCISCIS, P., Perino, A., Calagna, G., Corbisiero, F., Tiberio, F., Matteo, M., et al. (2013). Impact of monopolar and bipolar endometrial resection on abnormal uterine bleeding. GIORNALE ITALIANO DI OSTETRICIA E GINECOLOGIA, 35(6), 749-753 [10.11138/giog/2013.35.6.749]. | |
| Rivista: | ||
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI): | http://dx.doi.org/10.11138/giog/2013.35.6.749 | |
| Abstract: | Study Objective. To compare two procedures for endometrial resection: resectoscopy with monopolar knife versus resectoscopy with bipolar knife. Patients and methods. 76 perimenopausal patients affected by DUB (Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding), no longer wishing to remain pregnant and having failed to respond to pharmacological treatment, underwent endometrial ablation with monopolar loop (group A: 38 women) or bipolar loop (group B: 38 women). Operative parameters, complication rate, menstrual outcome were considered. Results. Operative time was no different between groups. The amount of distention fluid adsorbed was significantly higher in group A than in group B, and late cumulative complication rate was 44% in group A and 24% in group B. Menstrual cycle was, overall, controlled in both groups. Conclusions. Bipolar electrode is as effective as monopolar electrode for endometrial resection, but was safer than monopolar knife | |
| Settore Scientifico Disciplinare: | Settore MED/40 - Ginecologia E Ostetricia | |
| Appare nelle tipologie: | 1.01 Articolo in rivista |
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Descrizione | Tipologia | Licenza | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| De Franciscis.pdf | N/A | Open Access Visualizza/Apri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10447/97620
Copyright © 2022