Abstract BACKGROUND: This survey was performed to draw information on pain prevalence, intensity, and management from a sample of patients who were admitted to an oncologic center where a palliative care unit (PCU) has been established for 13 years. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey in an oncological department performed 1 day per month for six consecutive months. RESULTS: Of the 385 patients, 69.1, 19.2, 8.6, and 3.1 % had no pain, mild, moderate, and severe pain, respectively. Inpatients and patients with a low Karnofsky score showed higher levels of pain intensity (p < 0.0005). One hundred twenty-eight patients with pain or receiving analgesics were analyzed for pain management index (PMI). Only a minority of patients had negative PMI score, which was statistically associated with inpatient admission (p = 0.011). Fifty of these 128 patients had breakthrough pain (BTP), and all of them were receiving some medication for BTP. CONCLUSION: It is likely that the presence of PCU team providing consultation, advices, and cultural pressure, other than offering admissions for difficult cases had a positive impact on the use of analgesics, as compared with previous similar surveys performed in oncological setting, where a PCU was unavailable. This information confirms the need of the presence of a PCU in a high volume oncological department.

Mercadante, S., Guccione, C., Di Fatta, S., Alaimo, V., Prestia, G., Bellingardo, R., et al. (2013). Cancer pain management in an oncological ward in a comprehensive cancer center with an established palliative care unit. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 21, 3287-3292 [10.1007/s00520-013-1899-z].

Cancer pain management in an oncological ward in a comprehensive cancer center with an established palliative care unit.

GEBBIA, Vittorio;GIARRATANO, Antonino;CASUCCIO, Alessandra
2013-01-01

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND: This survey was performed to draw information on pain prevalence, intensity, and management from a sample of patients who were admitted to an oncologic center where a palliative care unit (PCU) has been established for 13 years. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey in an oncological department performed 1 day per month for six consecutive months. RESULTS: Of the 385 patients, 69.1, 19.2, 8.6, and 3.1 % had no pain, mild, moderate, and severe pain, respectively. Inpatients and patients with a low Karnofsky score showed higher levels of pain intensity (p < 0.0005). One hundred twenty-eight patients with pain or receiving analgesics were analyzed for pain management index (PMI). Only a minority of patients had negative PMI score, which was statistically associated with inpatient admission (p = 0.011). Fifty of these 128 patients had breakthrough pain (BTP), and all of them were receiving some medication for BTP. CONCLUSION: It is likely that the presence of PCU team providing consultation, advices, and cultural pressure, other than offering admissions for difficult cases had a positive impact on the use of analgesics, as compared with previous similar surveys performed in oncological setting, where a PCU was unavailable. This information confirms the need of the presence of a PCU in a high volume oncological department.
2013
Settore MED/06 - Oncologia Medica
Settore MED/41 - Anestesiologia
Settore MED/42 - Igiene Generale E Applicata
Mercadante, S., Guccione, C., Di Fatta, S., Alaimo, V., Prestia, G., Bellingardo, R., et al. (2013). Cancer pain management in an oncological ward in a comprehensive cancer center with an established palliative care unit. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 21, 3287-3292 [10.1007/s00520-013-1899-z].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
SCC 2013 TER.pdf

accesso aperto

Dimensione 137.16 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
137.16 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/96932
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 17
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact