BACKGROUND: Whether the oral factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban can be an alternative to warfarin in patients with venous thromboembolism is unclear. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority study, we randomly assigned patients with acute venous thromboembolism, who had initially received heparin, to receive edoxaban at a dose of 60 mg once daily, or 30 mg once daily (e.g., in the case of patients with creatinine clearance of 30 to 50 ml per minute or a body weight below 60 kg), or to receive warfarin. Patients received the study drug for 3 to 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent symptomatic venous thromboembolism. The principal safety outcome was major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 4921 patients presented with deep-vein thrombosis, and 3319 with a pulmonary embolism. Among patients receiving warfarin, the time in the therapeutic range was 63.5%. Edoxaban was noninferior to warfarin with respect to the primary efficacy outcome, w...

Büller, H.R., Décousus, H., Grosso, M.A., Mercuri, M., Middeldorp, S., Prins, M.H., et al. (2013). Edoxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism. THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 369(15), 1406-1415 [10.1056/NEJMoa1306638].

Edoxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism.

SIRAGUSA, Sergio;
2013-10-10

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether the oral factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban can be an alternative to warfarin in patients with venous thromboembolism is unclear. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority study, we randomly assigned patients with acute venous thromboembolism, who had initially received heparin, to receive edoxaban at a dose of 60 mg once daily, or 30 mg once daily (e.g., in the case of patients with creatinine clearance of 30 to 50 ml per minute or a body weight below 60 kg), or to receive warfarin. Patients received the study drug for 3 to 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent symptomatic venous thromboembolism. The principal safety outcome was major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 4921 patients presented with deep-vein thrombosis, and 3319 with a pulmonary embolism. Among patients receiving warfarin, the time in the therapeutic range was 63.5%. Edoxaban was noninferior to warfarin with respect to the primary efficacy outcome, w...
10-ott-2013
Büller, H.R., Décousus, H., Grosso, M.A., Mercuri, M., Middeldorp, S., Prins, M.H., et al. (2013). Edoxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism. THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 369(15), 1406-1415 [10.1056/NEJMoa1306638].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Edoxaban.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Descrizione: Article
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 819.34 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
819.34 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/96630
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1685
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1453
social impact