Bills of rights in contemporary constitutional democracies lend themselves to a pluralistic, rather than monistic or "irenistic", conception. Constitutional rights, principles, and values often conflict; they are plural, indeterminate, incommensurable. Thus, in constitutional democracies "powers of determination" (i.e., institutions whose task is to balance constitutional rights and values in their application to specific kinds of cases) are needed. Are powers of determination (e.g. judicial review of legislation, or constitutional amending by democratic assemblies) compatible with the ambitions of contemporary constitutionalism?
CELANO B (2005). Diritti fondamentali e poteri di determinazionbe nello Stato costituzionale di diritto. FILOSOFIA POLITICA, 19, n. 3, 427-444.
Diritti fondamentali e poteri di determinazionbe nello Stato costituzionale di diritto
CELANO, Bruno
2005-01-01
Abstract
Bills of rights in contemporary constitutional democracies lend themselves to a pluralistic, rather than monistic or "irenistic", conception. Constitutional rights, principles, and values often conflict; they are plural, indeterminate, incommensurable. Thus, in constitutional democracies "powers of determination" (i.e., institutions whose task is to balance constitutional rights and values in their application to specific kinds of cases) are needed. Are powers of determination (e.g. judicial review of legislation, or constitutional amending by democratic assemblies) compatible with the ambitions of contemporary constitutionalism?I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.