Building occupants are important factor in giving information on indoor conditions such as comfort, productivity, building performance and occupants´ health. Even that, being their appraisal mainly based on subjective judgments, it is difficult to set up a standard and objective method for this purpose. The present work aimed to describe, analyze and compare the most common tests on this topic, in order to highlight critical, failings and strengths.

Galatioto A, Leone G, Milone D, Pitruzzella S, Franzitta V (2014). Indoor environmental quality survey: a brief comparison between different Post Occupancy Evaluation methods, 864-867, 1148-1152 [10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.864-867.1148].

Indoor environmental quality survey: a brief comparison between different Post Occupancy Evaluation methods

GALATIOTO, Alessandra;LEONE, Giuliana;MILONE, Daniele;FRANZITTA, Vincenzo
2014-01-01

Abstract

Building occupants are important factor in giving information on indoor conditions such as comfort, productivity, building performance and occupants´ health. Even that, being their appraisal mainly based on subjective judgments, it is difficult to set up a standard and objective method for this purpose. The present work aimed to describe, analyze and compare the most common tests on this topic, in order to highlight critical, failings and strengths.
2014
Settore ING-IND/11 - Fisica Tecnica Ambientale
Galatioto A, Leone G, Milone D, Pitruzzella S, Franzitta V (2014). Indoor environmental quality survey: a brief comparison between different Post Occupancy Evaluation methods, 864-867, 1148-1152 [10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.864-867.1148].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
AMR.864-867.1148.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Dimensione 225.51 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
225.51 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/85624
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 20
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact