The use of ecological classification systems is becoming more and more widely used when studying phytoplankton. Grouping phytoplankton species into ecologically coherent groups allow to reduce redundancy and in this way, to handle a minor number of biological variables when investigating the ecological status of aquatic ecosystems. Three ecological classifications are mostly used when freshwater phytoplankton is studied: functional groups or coda, morpho-functional groups (MFGs) and morphologybased functional groups (MBFGs). In this study, these three ecological classifications were comparatively used along with two taxonomic classifications based on species and genera to analyse phytoplankton response to environmental variability in three subtropical Chinese reservoirs. Canonical correspondence analysis was performed to compare the five mentioned biological classifications. When ecological classifications were used, the percentage of variance explained in the biological groups–environmental variables was higher than that explained by the taxonomic classifications. Coda and MFGs showed a very high degree of overlapping, but since coda are associated to very detailed environmental templates, this method was more helpful in explaining phytoplankton variability in relation to environmental factors.

Hu, R., Han, B., & Naselli Flores, L. (2013). Comparing biological classifications of freshwater phytoplankton: a case study from South China. HYDROBIOLOGIA, 701, 219-233 [10.1007/s10750-012-1277-8].

Comparing biological classifications of freshwater phytoplankton: a case study from South China

NASELLI FLORES, Luigi
2013

Abstract

The use of ecological classification systems is becoming more and more widely used when studying phytoplankton. Grouping phytoplankton species into ecologically coherent groups allow to reduce redundancy and in this way, to handle a minor number of biological variables when investigating the ecological status of aquatic ecosystems. Three ecological classifications are mostly used when freshwater phytoplankton is studied: functional groups or coda, morpho-functional groups (MFGs) and morphologybased functional groups (MBFGs). In this study, these three ecological classifications were comparatively used along with two taxonomic classifications based on species and genera to analyse phytoplankton response to environmental variability in three subtropical Chinese reservoirs. Canonical correspondence analysis was performed to compare the five mentioned biological classifications. When ecological classifications were used, the percentage of variance explained in the biological groups–environmental variables was higher than that explained by the taxonomic classifications. Coda and MFGs showed a very high degree of overlapping, but since coda are associated to very detailed environmental templates, this method was more helpful in explaining phytoplankton variability in relation to environmental factors.
Settore BIO/03 - Botanica Ambientale E Applicata
http://download.springer.com/static/pdf/259/art%253A10.1007%252Fs10750-012-1277-8.pdf?auth66=1386162169_9cf0b32457a9fa153fcc47095f2c491d&ext=.pdf
Hu, R., Han, B., & Naselli Flores, L. (2013). Comparing biological classifications of freshwater phytoplankton: a case study from South China. HYDROBIOLOGIA, 701, 219-233 [10.1007/s10750-012-1277-8].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2013_Hu_Han_Naselli-Flores.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Descrizione: Articolo
Dimensione 723.01 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
723.01 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
10750_2012_1277_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Descrizione: Appendix
Dimensione 36.37 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
36.37 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/10447/84805
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 40
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 40
social impact