In 1993 a famous article by Raymond Duval highlighted a simple fact: the student can be confusing the mathematical object O, which is cognitively trying to build, with one of its semiotic representations R(O); and explained that this confusion was due to a sort of inevitable paradox: only someone who has already built O, can recognize R(O) as a representation of O and not as an object in itself. This discussion has subsequently been extremely influential for researchers. However, even if in different terms, many scholar of semiotics have emphasized the same phenomenon and in this paper we propose to recall some of them.
D’Amore, B., Fandiño Pinilla, M.I., Iori, M., Matteuzzi, M. (2013). Alcune riflessioni storico-critiche sul cosiddetto “paradosso di Duval”. L'INSEGNAMENTO DELLA MATEMATICA E DELLE SCIENZE INTEGRATE, 3(36B), 207-236.
Alcune riflessioni storico-critiche sul cosiddetto “paradosso di Duval”
IORI, Maura;
2013-01-01
Abstract
In 1993 a famous article by Raymond Duval highlighted a simple fact: the student can be confusing the mathematical object O, which is cognitively trying to build, with one of its semiotic representations R(O); and explained that this confusion was due to a sort of inevitable paradox: only someone who has already built O, can recognize R(O) as a representation of O and not as an object in itself. This discussion has subsequently been extremely influential for researchers. However, even if in different terms, many scholar of semiotics have emphasized the same phenomenon and in this paper we propose to recall some of them.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
D'Amore, Pinilla, Iori, Matteuzzi.pdf
Solo gestori archvio
Dimensione
455.01 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
455.01 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.