The best possible model to predict the erosion from an area of land has been suggested to be a physical model of the area that has similar soil type, land use, size, shape, slope and erosive inputs. Therefore, a replicated plot has to be considered the best possible, unbiased, real world model. In this paper the physical model concept was tested by using soil loss data collected on plots of different length at the experimental station of Sparacia, in Sicily (South Italy). This investigation supported the conclusions that i) a coefficient of determination between measured and predicted soil loss values of 0.77 has to be considered as the best-case prediction scenario and ii) an uncalibrated deterministic erosion model would not give more accurate results than those obtained by a replicated plot measurement. An effectiveness coefficient of 0.47-0.49 was obtained by applying the original USLE to predict event soil losses at Sparacia. The difference between the value of 0.6, corresponding to what we can expect from an uncalibrated erosion model, and the effectiveness coefficient of the selected model represents the maximum gap that has to be covered to obtain the realistically best estimate of plot soil loss at the event temporal scale.

Bagarello, V., & Ferro, V. (2012). TESTING THE “PHYSICAL MODEL CONCEPT” BY SOIL LOSS DATA MEASURED IN SICILY. CATENA, 95(95), 1-5 [10.1016/j.catena.2012.02.017].

TESTING THE “PHYSICAL MODEL CONCEPT” BY SOIL LOSS DATA MEASURED IN SICILY

BAGARELLO, Vincenzo;FERRO, Vito
2012

Abstract

The best possible model to predict the erosion from an area of land has been suggested to be a physical model of the area that has similar soil type, land use, size, shape, slope and erosive inputs. Therefore, a replicated plot has to be considered the best possible, unbiased, real world model. In this paper the physical model concept was tested by using soil loss data collected on plots of different length at the experimental station of Sparacia, in Sicily (South Italy). This investigation supported the conclusions that i) a coefficient of determination between measured and predicted soil loss values of 0.77 has to be considered as the best-case prediction scenario and ii) an uncalibrated deterministic erosion model would not give more accurate results than those obtained by a replicated plot measurement. An effectiveness coefficient of 0.47-0.49 was obtained by applying the original USLE to predict event soil losses at Sparacia. The difference between the value of 0.6, corresponding to what we can expect from an uncalibrated erosion model, and the effectiveness coefficient of the selected model represents the maximum gap that has to be covered to obtain the realistically best estimate of plot soil loss at the event temporal scale.
Settore AGR/08 - Idraulica Agraria E Sistemazioni Idraulico-Forestali
Bagarello, V., & Ferro, V. (2012). TESTING THE “PHYSICAL MODEL CONCEPT” BY SOIL LOSS DATA MEASURED IN SICILY. CATENA, 95(95), 1-5 [10.1016/j.catena.2012.02.017].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
9538552bddf08d97ec61d620ddca3ab2.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Descrizione: articolo principale
Dimensione 2.13 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.13 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/10447/77060
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact