The paper examines some of the questions emerging from the debate on mindreading regarding Quine's legacy and contribution to a new agenda on the issue. Since mindreading is an exercise in folk-psychology, a) which role folk psychology has to play according to Quine? b) was Quine's ac- count of mindreading closer to theory-theory, simulation theory or hybrid theory? c) was Quine a rationality theorist? d) are hybrid-theory and ra- tionality theory incompatible as many would suggest? On the score of the answers to these questions, the paper tries to suggest a Quinean inspired blend of rationality-based and hybrid view-based strategies to explain mindreading.
|Data di pubblicazione:||mag-2012|
|Titolo:||Quine and the Contemporary Debate on Mindreading|
|Tipologia:||Articolo su rivista|
|Citazione:||ZANET, G. (2012). Quine and the Contemporary Debate on Mindreading. DISPUTATIO, Vol. IV, No. 32, May 2012(No. 32), 395-412.|
|Tipo:||Articolo in rivista|
|Appare nelle tipologie:||01 - Articolo su rivista|