Background: Family presence during invasive procedures and resuscitation (FPDIP/R; FPDR) is increasingly advocated, yet no validated instrument assesses nurses' perceptions and preparedness including organisational readiness for implementation. Aim: To develop and psychometrically validate the FPDIP/R-NPPQ. Study Design: A multicentre cross-sectional survey was conducted in three Italian hospitals (April–July 2024). Registered nurses (N = 212) completed a study-specific instrument initially comprising 52 items; psychometric analyses were performed on 37 Likert-type items. We applied a two-step strategy: exploratory factor analysis (EFA; parallel analysis, principal axis factoring, oblimin rotation, marker-index screening) followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using robust maximum likelihood for ordinal/non-normal data. Reliability was estimated via McDonald's ω. A grant from the Center of Excellence for Nursing Scholarship, Rome, March 2025, is funding this research. Results: EFA supported a 19-item, three-factor solution explaining 57.47% of variance: (1) emotional value and relational benefits of family presence (5 items); (2) communication skills and structured management (6 items); and (3) operational support through a dedicated staff member (8 items). CFA confirmed good fit (RMSEA = 0.05, 90% CI 0.04–0.06; CFit = 0.36; CFI = 0.93; TLI = 0.92; SRMR = 0.07), with standardised loadings ranging 0.24–0.92 and ω = 0.82–0.87 across factors. Model refinement improved fit without permitting cross-loadings, preserving construct distinctiveness while accounting for localised method effects. Conclusions: The FPDIP/R-NPPQ is a valid and reliable 19-item, three-factor instrument measuring nurses' readiness for family presence during invasive procedures and resuscitation. By distinguishing attitudes towards family presence, communication/management preparedness and organisational readiness (including the facilitator role), the tool enables services to identify implementation barriers and to plan targeted training and governance strategies prior to adopting FPDR/FPDIP policies. Relevance to Clinical Practice: The FPDIP/R-NPPQ supports clinical governance by providing actionable subscale profiles to guide implementation of FPDIP/R. It can be used to baseline readiness across units, identify specific training and protocol needs and inform organisational decisions such as the allocation of a trained family facilitator, thereby supporting safer and more standardised family presence practices during critical procedures.

Bartoli, D., Trotta, F., Figura, M., Di Muzio, M., Napolitano, D., Fatata, M., et al. (2026). Family Presence During Invasive Procedures or Resuscitation, Nurse Perception and Preparedness Questionnaire (FPDIP/R-NPPQ): A Validity and Reliability Study. NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 31(3) [10.1111/nicc.70470].

Family Presence During Invasive Procedures or Resuscitation, Nurse Perception and Preparedness Questionnaire (FPDIP/R-NPPQ): A Validity and Reliability Study

Figura M.;
2026-01-01

Abstract

Background: Family presence during invasive procedures and resuscitation (FPDIP/R; FPDR) is increasingly advocated, yet no validated instrument assesses nurses' perceptions and preparedness including organisational readiness for implementation. Aim: To develop and psychometrically validate the FPDIP/R-NPPQ. Study Design: A multicentre cross-sectional survey was conducted in three Italian hospitals (April–July 2024). Registered nurses (N = 212) completed a study-specific instrument initially comprising 52 items; psychometric analyses were performed on 37 Likert-type items. We applied a two-step strategy: exploratory factor analysis (EFA; parallel analysis, principal axis factoring, oblimin rotation, marker-index screening) followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using robust maximum likelihood for ordinal/non-normal data. Reliability was estimated via McDonald's ω. A grant from the Center of Excellence for Nursing Scholarship, Rome, March 2025, is funding this research. Results: EFA supported a 19-item, three-factor solution explaining 57.47% of variance: (1) emotional value and relational benefits of family presence (5 items); (2) communication skills and structured management (6 items); and (3) operational support through a dedicated staff member (8 items). CFA confirmed good fit (RMSEA = 0.05, 90% CI 0.04–0.06; CFit = 0.36; CFI = 0.93; TLI = 0.92; SRMR = 0.07), with standardised loadings ranging 0.24–0.92 and ω = 0.82–0.87 across factors. Model refinement improved fit without permitting cross-loadings, preserving construct distinctiveness while accounting for localised method effects. Conclusions: The FPDIP/R-NPPQ is a valid and reliable 19-item, three-factor instrument measuring nurses' readiness for family presence during invasive procedures and resuscitation. By distinguishing attitudes towards family presence, communication/management preparedness and organisational readiness (including the facilitator role), the tool enables services to identify implementation barriers and to plan targeted training and governance strategies prior to adopting FPDR/FPDIP policies. Relevance to Clinical Practice: The FPDIP/R-NPPQ supports clinical governance by providing actionable subscale profiles to guide implementation of FPDIP/R. It can be used to baseline readiness across units, identify specific training and protocol needs and inform organisational decisions such as the allocation of a trained family facilitator, thereby supporting safer and more standardised family presence practices during critical procedures.
2026
Settore MEDS-24/C - Scienze infermieristiche generali, cliniche, pediatriche e ostetrico-ginecologiche e neonatali
Bartoli, D., Trotta, F., Figura, M., Di Muzio, M., Napolitano, D., Fatata, M., et al. (2026). Family Presence During Invasive Procedures or Resuscitation, Nurse Perception and Preparedness Questionnaire (FPDIP/R-NPPQ): A Validity and Reliability Study. NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 31(3) [10.1111/nicc.70470].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
45. Bartoli (2026) Prot. Famm pres..pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 668.51 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
668.51 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/717430
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact