Patient Perceptions of Embryo Visualisation and Ultrasound-Guided Embryo Transfer During IVF: A Descriptive Observational Study

Objective: To evaluate patient perceptions regarding ultrasound-guided embryo transfer, visualisation of embryos prior to transfer, and continuity of care with the same physician during in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatments. Setting: Between January and September 2023, this study was conducted at the IVF MOMO’ FertiLIFE centre in Bisceglie, Italy. Design: Descriptive and observational study based on an anonymous survey administered to IVF patients at the time of embryo transfer. The goal was to assess the subjective emotional and psychological response to selected procedural elements of the embryo transfer process. Participants: Out of 284 distributed questionnaires, 200 were included in the final analysis. Inclusion required fully completed responses. Questionnaires with incomplete, unclear answers or patient refusal were excluded. The study group was compared with the general IVF patient population treated at the centre over the past 5 years to ensure representativeness. Methods: Patients completed a structured questionnaire using a five-point Likert scale. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, Spearman’s rank correlation, Friedman test, and exploratory factor analysis. Ethical approval was obtained (CELFer no. 07/2021), and all participants provided written informed consent. Results: The majority of patients reported a heightened sense of calm and reassurance during ultrasound-guided embryo transfer. Viewing embryos on a monitor before transfer was also positively perceived. A strong preference emerged for continuity of care with the same physician throughout the IVF process. While this study did not assess objective stress levels or clinical outcomes, the findings highlight the psychological comfort associated with these patient-centred practices. Limitations: This single-centre study is based on self-reported data and lacks objective assessments of psychological well-being. Therefore, results reflect personal perceptions rather than measurable clinical outcomes. Broader, multicentre research using validated psychological tools is needed to confirm and expand these findings. Furthermore, the questionnaire used in this study was developed internally and not validated externally with standardised psychometric instruments. Conclusions: This study provides insight into IVF patients’ subjective experiences, emphasising the perceived emotional benefits of specific procedural and relational aspects of care. These findings support the integration of patient-centred strategies—such as visual engagement and physician continuity—into routine IVF practice to enhance overall patient well-being.