Introduction: Poor ovarian response (POR) remains a major limitation in assisted reproductive medicine. Direct comparisons between r-hFSH alfa + r-LH and r-hFSH delta + hMG in this population are scarce. Methods: This retrospective study included 437 POR patients treated between 2018 and 2022. Controlled ovarian stimulation involved either r-hFSH alfa + r-LH (Group A) or r-hFSH delta + hMG (Group B). After exclusions, 148 patients per group who reached embryo transfer were analyzed. Primary outcomes were total oocytes, metaphase II (MII) oocytes and embryos. Secondary outcomes included β-hCG positivity, clinical pregnancy and pharmacoeconomic evaluation. Results: Group A showed significantly higher numbers of oocytes (p=0.01), MII oocytes (p=0.02) and embryos (p=0.03). No significant differences in biochemical or clinical pregnancy were observed (OR 1.12; 95% CI: 0.79–1.59). The r-hFSH alfa + r-LH protocol required lower total gonadotropin doses and resulted in an average saving of €690 per additional MII oocyte. Discussion: The r-hFSH alfa + r-LH regimen improved ovarian response and cost-efficiency without affecting pregnancy outcomes. Prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm these results.

Baldini, G.M., Baldini, D., Lot, D., Malvasi, A., Laganà, A.S., Palumbo, M., et al. (2025). Comparative efficacy of r-hFSH Alfa + r-LH versus r-hFSH delta + hMG in poor ovarian responders. FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 16 [10.3389/fendo.2025.1656569].

Comparative efficacy of r-hFSH Alfa + r-LH versus r-hFSH delta + hMG in poor ovarian responders

Laganà, Antonio Simone;
2025-11-25

Abstract

Introduction: Poor ovarian response (POR) remains a major limitation in assisted reproductive medicine. Direct comparisons between r-hFSH alfa + r-LH and r-hFSH delta + hMG in this population are scarce. Methods: This retrospective study included 437 POR patients treated between 2018 and 2022. Controlled ovarian stimulation involved either r-hFSH alfa + r-LH (Group A) or r-hFSH delta + hMG (Group B). After exclusions, 148 patients per group who reached embryo transfer were analyzed. Primary outcomes were total oocytes, metaphase II (MII) oocytes and embryos. Secondary outcomes included β-hCG positivity, clinical pregnancy and pharmacoeconomic evaluation. Results: Group A showed significantly higher numbers of oocytes (p=0.01), MII oocytes (p=0.02) and embryos (p=0.03). No significant differences in biochemical or clinical pregnancy were observed (OR 1.12; 95% CI: 0.79–1.59). The r-hFSH alfa + r-LH protocol required lower total gonadotropin doses and resulted in an average saving of €690 per additional MII oocyte. Discussion: The r-hFSH alfa + r-LH regimen improved ovarian response and cost-efficiency without affecting pregnancy outcomes. Prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm these results.
25-nov-2025
Settore MEDS-21/A - Ginecologia e ostetricia
Baldini, G.M., Baldini, D., Lot, D., Malvasi, A., Laganà, A.S., Palumbo, M., et al. (2025). Comparative efficacy of r-hFSH Alfa + r-LH versus r-hFSH delta + hMG in poor ovarian responders. FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 16 [10.3389/fendo.2025.1656569].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
650 - r-hFSH Alfa + r-LH versus r-hFSH delta + hMG in poor ovarian responders.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Full text
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 846.27 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
846.27 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/713706
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact