Background: In laparoscopic surgery, specimen retrieval can require enlarging abdominal incisions, reducing the minimally invasive benefits. Transvaginal specimen extraction (TVSE) can offer a safer, more cosmetic alternative for women. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the safety and outcomes of TVSE compared with transabdominal extraction, regardless of surgical indication. Methods: EMBASE, Scopus, PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to April 2025. Studies were grouped by design, surgical specialty, and extraction method (port enlargement versus mini-laparotomy) to explore heterogeneity. Results: Twenty-five studies were included for 2751 patients (1144 TVSE, 1607 transabdominal extraction) in general, urologic, or gynecologic surgery. TVSE was associated with lower postoperative pain (mean difference −0.98, 95%CI −1.30 to −0.66), rescue analgesia use (OR 0.38, 95%CI 0.28 to 0.51), postoperative complications (OR 0.55, 95%CI 0.34 to 0.89), shorter hospital stays (mean difference −1.04, 95%CI −1.77 to −0.30), and higher cosmetic satisfaction (mean difference 0.91, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.35), especially versus mini-laparotomy. Blood loss, intraoperative complications, and dyspareunia did not differ. Conclusion: TVSE is associated with improved postoperative outcomes when it replaces mini-laparotomy, whereas less benefit is observed versus laparoscopic port-site enlargement. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Galli, L., Luka, L., Franchi, M.P., Zorzato, P.C., Festi, A., Ricci, A., et al. (2026). Transvaginal versus transabdominal extraction techniques in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 35(4), 298-320 [10.1080/13645706.2026.2653713].

Transvaginal versus transabdominal extraction techniques in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Laganà, Antonio Simone;
2026-08-01

Abstract

Background: In laparoscopic surgery, specimen retrieval can require enlarging abdominal incisions, reducing the minimally invasive benefits. Transvaginal specimen extraction (TVSE) can offer a safer, more cosmetic alternative for women. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the safety and outcomes of TVSE compared with transabdominal extraction, regardless of surgical indication. Methods: EMBASE, Scopus, PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to April 2025. Studies were grouped by design, surgical specialty, and extraction method (port enlargement versus mini-laparotomy) to explore heterogeneity. Results: Twenty-five studies were included for 2751 patients (1144 TVSE, 1607 transabdominal extraction) in general, urologic, or gynecologic surgery. TVSE was associated with lower postoperative pain (mean difference −0.98, 95%CI −1.30 to −0.66), rescue analgesia use (OR 0.38, 95%CI 0.28 to 0.51), postoperative complications (OR 0.55, 95%CI 0.34 to 0.89), shorter hospital stays (mean difference −1.04, 95%CI −1.77 to −0.30), and higher cosmetic satisfaction (mean difference 0.91, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.35), especially versus mini-laparotomy. Blood loss, intraoperative complications, and dyspareunia did not differ. Conclusion: TVSE is associated with improved postoperative outcomes when it replaces mini-laparotomy, whereas less benefit is observed versus laparoscopic port-site enlargement. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.
ago-2026
Settore MEDS-21/A - Ginecologia e ostetricia
Galli, L., Luka, L., Franchi, M.P., Zorzato, P.C., Festi, A., Ricci, A., et al. (2026). Transvaginal versus transabdominal extraction techniques in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 35(4), 298-320 [10.1080/13645706.2026.2653713].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
664 - Transvaginal versus transabdominal extraction techniques.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Descrizione: Full text
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 3.85 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.85 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/713687
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact