The abdicative waiver of the right of ownership constitutes one of the most controversial institutions of contemporary civil law, posing fun-damental questions regarding the nature, limits, and social function of ownership rights. The recent and decisive ruling of the United Sec-tions of the Court of Cassation, no. 23093 of August 11, 2025, has re-solved the jurisprudential conflict regarding the admissibility of the ab-dicative act, opening new analytical perspectives on its compatibility with constitutional principles.
Ferro, S.A. (2026). LA FUNZIONE SOCIALE ALLA PROVA DELLA RINUNCIA ABDICATIVA E DELLA CONVENIENZA ERARIALE. EGOISMO A SENSO UNICO?. CONTRATTO E IMPRESA(2), 459-496.
LA FUNZIONE SOCIALE ALLA PROVA DELLA RINUNCIA ABDICATIVA E DELLA CONVENIENZA ERARIALE. EGOISMO A SENSO UNICO?
Sharon Alison Ferro
2026-06-01
Abstract
The abdicative waiver of the right of ownership constitutes one of the most controversial institutions of contemporary civil law, posing fun-damental questions regarding the nature, limits, and social function of ownership rights. The recent and decisive ruling of the United Sec-tions of the Court of Cassation, no. 23093 of August 11, 2025, has re-solved the jurisprudential conflict regarding the admissibility of the ab-dicative act, opening new analytical perspectives on its compatibility with constitutional principles.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
CI_02_2026_0459-FERRO.pdf
Solo gestori archvio
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
376.74 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
376.74 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
