Attenzione: i dati modificati non sono ancora stati salvati. Per confermare inserimenti o cancellazioni di voci è necessario confermare con il tasto SALVA/INSERISCI in fondo alla pagina
Archivio istituzionale della ricerca dell'Università degli Studi di Palermo
A prescribing cascade occurs when an adverse drug reaction (ADR) generated from an index drug (Drug A) is mistaken for a new medical condition that is in turn managed with a new drug prescription (Drug B). Prescribing cascades represent a factor influencing inappropriate prescribing and unnecessary polypharmacy, especially among older adults. Using the REPOSI registry, we conduct a retrospective observational study to examine the prevalence of potential prescribing cascades, as identified in the ThinkCascades framework, among patients aged ≥ 65 years admitted to geriatric or internal medicine wards. Evaluation was made at (i) admission, (ii) discharge, and (iii) at the 3 month follow-up. At admission the prescribing cascade was defined as “not-determined” owing to the unavailability of sequential prescription information, while at discharge or 3 month follow-up the cascade was defined as “introduced” when the marker medication (Drug B) was prescribed after the index medication (Drug A). At admission, among the REPOSI population of 10,253 hospitalized patients, 13.0% of them (1,335 cases) showed at least one “not-determined” prescribing cascade, with major prevalence for calcium channel blockers (CCBs) combined with diuretics (n = 932, 65.6%). During hospitalization, a total of 305 potential prescribing cascades were introduced, but 474 not-determined cascades were deprescribed at discharge. Three months after discharge, 31 new cases of potential prescribing cascades were introduced. For four out of nine prescribing cascades, low or no cases were found in all three situations. The proportion of patients exposed to potentially inappropriate prescribing cascades was relatively low. However, these findings highlight the need for practical tools to support physicians in preventing inappropriate prescribing.
Restelli, A., Crippa, C., Nobili, A., Mannucci, P.M., Pasina, L., Null, N., et al. (2026). Prescribing cascades among hospitalized older adults: a retrospective cohort study from the REPOSI registry. INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE [10.1007/s11739-026-04338-6].
Prescribing cascades among hospitalized older adults: a retrospective cohort study from the REPOSI registry
A prescribing cascade occurs when an adverse drug reaction (ADR) generated from an index drug (Drug A) is mistaken for a new medical condition that is in turn managed with a new drug prescription (Drug B). Prescribing cascades represent a factor influencing inappropriate prescribing and unnecessary polypharmacy, especially among older adults. Using the REPOSI registry, we conduct a retrospective observational study to examine the prevalence of potential prescribing cascades, as identified in the ThinkCascades framework, among patients aged ≥ 65 years admitted to geriatric or internal medicine wards. Evaluation was made at (i) admission, (ii) discharge, and (iii) at the 3 month follow-up. At admission the prescribing cascade was defined as “not-determined” owing to the unavailability of sequential prescription information, while at discharge or 3 month follow-up the cascade was defined as “introduced” when the marker medication (Drug B) was prescribed after the index medication (Drug A). At admission, among the REPOSI population of 10,253 hospitalized patients, 13.0% of them (1,335 cases) showed at least one “not-determined” prescribing cascade, with major prevalence for calcium channel blockers (CCBs) combined with diuretics (n = 932, 65.6%). During hospitalization, a total of 305 potential prescribing cascades were introduced, but 474 not-determined cascades were deprescribed at discharge. Three months after discharge, 31 new cases of potential prescribing cascades were introduced. For four out of nine prescribing cascades, low or no cases were found in all three situations. The proportion of patients exposed to potentially inappropriate prescribing cascades was relatively low. However, these findings highlight the need for practical tools to support physicians in preventing inappropriate prescribing.
Restelli, A., Crippa, C., Nobili, A., Mannucci, P.M., Pasina, L., Null, N., et al. (2026). Prescribing cascades among hospitalized older adults: a retrospective cohort study from the REPOSI registry. INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE [10.1007/s11739-026-04338-6].
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/708223
Citazioni
ND
0
0
social impact
Conferma cancellazione
Sei sicuro che questo prodotto debba essere cancellato?
simulazione ASN
Il report seguente simula gli indicatori relativi alla propria produzione scientifica in relazione alle soglie ASN 2023-2025 del proprio SC/SSD. Si ricorda che il superamento dei valori soglia (almeno 2 su 3) è requisito necessario ma non sufficiente al conseguimento dell'abilitazione. La simulazione si basa sui dati IRIS e sugli indicatori bibliometrici alla data indicata e non tiene conto di eventuali periodi di congedo obbligatorio, che in sede di domanda ASN danno diritto a incrementi percentuali dei valori. La simulazione può differire dall'esito di un’eventuale domanda ASN sia per errori di catalogazione e/o dati mancanti in IRIS, sia per la variabilità dei dati bibliometrici nel tempo. Si consideri che Anvur calcola i valori degli indicatori all'ultima data utile per la presentazione delle domande.
La presente simulazione è stata realizzata sulla base delle specifiche raccolte sul tavolo ER del Focus Group IRIS coordinato dall’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e delle regole riportate nel DM 589/2018 e allegata Tabella A. Cineca, l’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e il Focus Group IRIS non si assumono alcuna responsabilità in merito all’uso che il diretto interessato o terzi faranno della simulazione. Si specifica inoltre che la simulazione contiene calcoli effettuati con dati e algoritmi di pubblico dominio e deve quindi essere considerata come un mero ausilio al calcolo svolgibile manualmente o con strumenti equivalenti.