Sustainable development is therefore characterized by a close but intricate relationship with the ESR, involving potential intragenerational and “intra-poor people” social conflicts, which can raise international legal disputes between States or between individuals and States. These brief considerations call for an analysis of the practices of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR) and the European Committee of Social Rights (ECSR) on the place that the notion of sustainable development has in the interpretation of the two most important international binding multilateral instruments concerning the so-called second generation rights. The paper therefore focuses precisely on the practice of the two mentioned treaty bodies rather than on the interpretations proposed in academic literature to date.
Starita, M., De Vittor, F. (2026). The Place of Sustainable Development in the Practice of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the European Committee of Social Rights. In G. Palmisano (a cura di), Environmental Sustainability as a Protected Collective Interest in International and EU Law (pp. 109-149). Napoli : Editoriale scientifica.
The Place of Sustainable Development in the Practice of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the European Committee of Social Rights
Starita Massimo;
2026-06-01
Abstract
Sustainable development is therefore characterized by a close but intricate relationship with the ESR, involving potential intragenerational and “intra-poor people” social conflicts, which can raise international legal disputes between States or between individuals and States. These brief considerations call for an analysis of the practices of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR) and the European Committee of Social Rights (ECSR) on the place that the notion of sustainable development has in the interpretation of the two most important international binding multilateral instruments concerning the so-called second generation rights. The paper therefore focuses precisely on the practice of the two mentioned treaty bodies rather than on the interpretations proposed in academic literature to date.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Starita.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
205.19 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
205.19 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


