Prevention of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) associated with lowdose bone-modifying agents (LD-BMAs) remains a clinically relevant challenge, particularly due to the heterogeneity of recommendations and the growing number of patients exposed to these therapies. Unlike high-dose regimens, LD-BMAs are associated with a lower incidence and longer latency of MRONJ, generating uncertainty regarding the optimal timing and scope of dental interventions. This commentary critically compares four major international position papers and consensus documents (AAOMS 2022, SIPMO–SICMF 2020/2024, Chinese Expert Consensus 2024, and SIOT–SIdP 2023) through four pragmatic questions concerning patient stratification, timing of dental assessment, speed of risk reduction, and the role of prescriber-oriented screening tools. The analysis highlights substantial discrepancies among preventive models, particularly regarding whether pre-treatment dental treatments should be mandatory or whether early post-initiation assessment may be acceptable in selected low-risk patients

Campisi, G., Coppini, M., Fusco, V., Bedogni, A., Bertoldo, F., Mauceri, R. (2026). Timing, Geography, and Pragmatic Risk Reduction in Prevention of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw During Low-Dose BMA Therapy. ORAL, 6(3) [10.3390/oral6030062].

Timing, Geography, and Pragmatic Risk Reduction in Prevention of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw During Low-Dose BMA Therapy

Campisi, Giuseppina;Coppini, Martina;Mauceri, Rodolfo
2026-05-20

Abstract

Prevention of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) associated with lowdose bone-modifying agents (LD-BMAs) remains a clinically relevant challenge, particularly due to the heterogeneity of recommendations and the growing number of patients exposed to these therapies. Unlike high-dose regimens, LD-BMAs are associated with a lower incidence and longer latency of MRONJ, generating uncertainty regarding the optimal timing and scope of dental interventions. This commentary critically compares four major international position papers and consensus documents (AAOMS 2022, SIPMO–SICMF 2020/2024, Chinese Expert Consensus 2024, and SIOT–SIdP 2023) through four pragmatic questions concerning patient stratification, timing of dental assessment, speed of risk reduction, and the role of prescriber-oriented screening tools. The analysis highlights substantial discrepancies among preventive models, particularly regarding whether pre-treatment dental treatments should be mandatory or whether early post-initiation assessment may be acceptable in selected low-risk patients
20-mag-2026
Campisi, G., Coppini, M., Fusco, V., Bedogni, A., Bertoldo, F., Mauceri, R. (2026). Timing, Geography, and Pragmatic Risk Reduction in Prevention of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw During Low-Dose BMA Therapy. ORAL, 6(3) [10.3390/oral6030062].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
oral-06-00062.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 559.15 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
559.15 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/707552
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact