Prevention of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) associated with lowdose bone-modifying agents (LD-BMAs) remains a clinically relevant challenge, particularly due to the heterogeneity of recommendations and the growing number of patients exposed to these therapies. Unlike high-dose regimens, LD-BMAs are associated with a lower incidence and longer latency of MRONJ, generating uncertainty regarding the optimal timing and scope of dental interventions. This commentary critically compares four major international position papers and consensus documents (AAOMS 2022, SIPMO–SICMF 2020/2024, Chinese Expert Consensus 2024, and SIOT–SIdP 2023) through four pragmatic questions concerning patient stratification, timing of dental assessment, speed of risk reduction, and the role of prescriber-oriented screening tools. The analysis highlights substantial discrepancies among preventive models, particularly regarding whether pre-treatment dental treatments should be mandatory or whether early post-initiation assessment may be acceptable in selected low-risk patients
Campisi, G., Coppini, M., Fusco, V., Bedogni, A., Bertoldo, F., Mauceri, R. (2026). Timing, Geography, and Pragmatic Risk Reduction in Prevention of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw During Low-Dose BMA Therapy. ORAL, 6(3) [10.3390/oral6030062].
Timing, Geography, and Pragmatic Risk Reduction in Prevention of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw During Low-Dose BMA Therapy
Campisi, Giuseppina;Coppini, Martina;Mauceri, Rodolfo
2026-05-20
Abstract
Prevention of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) associated with lowdose bone-modifying agents (LD-BMAs) remains a clinically relevant challenge, particularly due to the heterogeneity of recommendations and the growing number of patients exposed to these therapies. Unlike high-dose regimens, LD-BMAs are associated with a lower incidence and longer latency of MRONJ, generating uncertainty regarding the optimal timing and scope of dental interventions. This commentary critically compares four major international position papers and consensus documents (AAOMS 2022, SIPMO–SICMF 2020/2024, Chinese Expert Consensus 2024, and SIOT–SIdP 2023) through four pragmatic questions concerning patient stratification, timing of dental assessment, speed of risk reduction, and the role of prescriber-oriented screening tools. The analysis highlights substantial discrepancies among preventive models, particularly regarding whether pre-treatment dental treatments should be mandatory or whether early post-initiation assessment may be acceptable in selected low-risk patients| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
oral-06-00062.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
559.15 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
559.15 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


