The paper focuses on a few gaps and slips found in lines 13 and 52-53 of P. Bodmer 27 (Thuc. 6.1.2, 6.2.5). Line 13 demands a reassessment of Thucydides’ manuscript tradition which results in a new textual proposal, while the other case (ll. 52-53) can be explained by suggesting a trivial mistake.

Occhipinti, E. (2025). P.Bodmer 27, ll. 11-15, 51-56 and THUC. 6.1.2, 6.2.5. Textual Conjectures. ANALECTA PAPYROLOGICA, 40(2), 55-59.

P.Bodmer 27, ll. 11-15, 51-56 and THUC. 6.1.2, 6.2.5. Textual Conjectures

Egidia Occhipinti
2025-01-01

Abstract

The paper focuses on a few gaps and slips found in lines 13 and 52-53 of P. Bodmer 27 (Thuc. 6.1.2, 6.2.5). Line 13 demands a reassessment of Thucydides’ manuscript tradition which results in a new textual proposal, while the other case (ll. 52-53) can be explained by suggesting a trivial mistake.
2025
Settore FICP-01/C - Papirologia
Settore STAN-01/A - Storia greca
Occhipinti, E. (2025). P.Bodmer 27, ll. 11-15, 51-56 and THUC. 6.1.2, 6.2.5. Textual Conjectures. ANALECTA PAPYROLOGICA, 40(2), 55-59.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
04. Occhipinti definitivo.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Descrizione: Articolo principale, indice e copertina
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 1.03 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.03 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/707308
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact