"Vulnerability" ranks among the most common terms in contemporary debates on migration and asylum. Yet the concept remains strikingly elusive. In high-income countries, vulnerability requires clearer definition: it must specify who qualifies as infantilization. By re-examining the tension between care and control, the article offers a critical reflection on inclusion practices within reception systems, calling for models capable of recognising the agency, skills, and social potential of refugee women.
Bartholini, I.M. (2026). Infantilization or inclusion within the reception system? A case study on the experience of female asylum seekers and international protection holders in Palermo. In D. Mendola (a cura di), The vulnerability of asylum seekers and refugees in Europe (pp. 95-101). Milano : Neodemos.
Infantilization or inclusion within the reception system? A case study on the experience of female asylum seekers and international protection holders in Palermo
Bartholini
2026-02-01
Abstract
"Vulnerability" ranks among the most common terms in contemporary debates on migration and asylum. Yet the concept remains strikingly elusive. In high-income countries, vulnerability requires clearer definition: it must specify who qualifies as infantilization. By re-examining the tension between care and control, the article offers a critical reflection on inclusion practices within reception systems, calling for models capable of recognising the agency, skills, and social potential of refugee women.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Infantilization_or_inclusion within...95-101.pdf
Solo gestori archvio
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
205.12 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
205.12 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


