The paper focuses on how Justinian and his chancellery resolved controversial cases found in the works of classical jurists. It is divided into two parts. In the first, an examination of the quinquaginta decisiones and the constitutiones ad commodum propositi operis pertinentes emonstrates the existence of a fixed expository structure (casus, quaestio, solutio). In the second, C. 6.30.21 and C. 6.24.14 are analysed to show how the emperor adopts a way of reasoning similar to that of the classical jurists. In particular, the legislator adopts the logicallegal instrument of the distinctio.
Bono, F. (2022). Iustinianus distinguit. JUS(6), 56-81 [10.26350/18277942_000100].
Iustinianus distinguit
Bono, Francesco
2022-01-01
Abstract
The paper focuses on how Justinian and his chancellery resolved controversial cases found in the works of classical jurists. It is divided into two parts. In the first, an examination of the quinquaginta decisiones and the constitutiones ad commodum propositi operis pertinentes emonstrates the existence of a fixed expository structure (casus, quaestio, solutio). In the second, C. 6.30.21 and C. 6.24.14 are analysed to show how the emperor adopts a way of reasoning similar to that of the classical jurists. In particular, the legislator adopts the logicallegal instrument of the distinctio.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
BONO JUSONLINE_6_2022_Final.pdf
Solo gestori archvio
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
289.73 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
289.73 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
