Background: Post-cardiotomy acute right ventricular failure (aRVF) constitutes a complex clinical challenge that might necessitate escalating interventions, including extracorporeal life support (ECLS). This study evaluates outcomes of adults requiring ECLS for post-cardiotomy acute right ventricular failure (aRVF) compared to other post-cardiotomy indications. Methods: In this multicenter, international, retrospective study, we analyzed patients undergoing post-cardiotomy ECLS from January 2000 to December 2020 and compared patients' characteristics and in-hospital mortality between aRVF and other indications groups. Results: Of 2010 patients, 240 (12%) had aRVF and 1770 (88%) had other indication for ECLS. Demographics were similar between groups (median age: 65 years [55-72]; p=0.217; males 60%; p=0.675). The aRVF group showed higher pre-operative right-sided cardiac dysfunction, including pre-existing right ventricular failure (aRVF: 22%; other indications: 8%; p<0.001) and biventricular failure (aRVF: 12%; other indications: 7%; p=0.013). aRVF patients more frequently underwent tricuspid valve surgery (aRVF: 20%; other indications: 13%; p=0.003) and aortic root procedures (aRVF: 24%; other indications: 13%). They also required longer ECLS support (aRVF: 135 hours [70-221]; other indications:116 hours [58-192]; p=0.025) and longer intensive care unit stay (aRVF: 15 days [7-291]; other indications: 13 days [6-25]; p=0.042). Despite more complications, including non-surgical bleeding (aRVF: 31%; other indications: 25%; p=0.042) and persistent right heart failure (aRVF: 50%; other indications: 17%; p<0.001), both in-hospital survival (aRVF: 59%; other indications: 61%; p=0.526) and long-term survival were comparable (log-rank p=0.17). Conclusions: Patients requiring ECLS for post-cardiotomy aRVF, despite higher pre-operative risks and complex clinical courses, achieve survival rates comparable to other indications patients.
Bianchi, G., Perazzo, A., Mariani, S., Van Bussel, B.C.T., Di Mauro, M., Wiedeman, D., et al. (2026). Extracorporeal Life Support for Post-Cardiotomy Acute Right Ventricular Failure: a Retrospective Observational Multicenter Study. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY [10.1016/j.athoracsur.2026.02.033].
Extracorporeal Life Support for Post-Cardiotomy Acute Right Ventricular Failure: a Retrospective Observational Multicenter Study
Raffa, Giuseppe Maria;
2026-03-13
Abstract
Background: Post-cardiotomy acute right ventricular failure (aRVF) constitutes a complex clinical challenge that might necessitate escalating interventions, including extracorporeal life support (ECLS). This study evaluates outcomes of adults requiring ECLS for post-cardiotomy acute right ventricular failure (aRVF) compared to other post-cardiotomy indications. Methods: In this multicenter, international, retrospective study, we analyzed patients undergoing post-cardiotomy ECLS from January 2000 to December 2020 and compared patients' characteristics and in-hospital mortality between aRVF and other indications groups. Results: Of 2010 patients, 240 (12%) had aRVF and 1770 (88%) had other indication for ECLS. Demographics were similar between groups (median age: 65 years [55-72]; p=0.217; males 60%; p=0.675). The aRVF group showed higher pre-operative right-sided cardiac dysfunction, including pre-existing right ventricular failure (aRVF: 22%; other indications: 8%; p<0.001) and biventricular failure (aRVF: 12%; other indications: 7%; p=0.013). aRVF patients more frequently underwent tricuspid valve surgery (aRVF: 20%; other indications: 13%; p=0.003) and aortic root procedures (aRVF: 24%; other indications: 13%). They also required longer ECLS support (aRVF: 135 hours [70-221]; other indications:116 hours [58-192]; p=0.025) and longer intensive care unit stay (aRVF: 15 days [7-291]; other indications: 13 days [6-25]; p=0.042). Despite more complications, including non-surgical bleeding (aRVF: 31%; other indications: 25%; p=0.042) and persistent right heart failure (aRVF: 50%; other indications: 17%; p<0.001), both in-hospital survival (aRVF: 59%; other indications: 61%; p=0.526) and long-term survival were comparable (log-rank p=0.17). Conclusions: Patients requiring ECLS for post-cardiotomy aRVF, despite higher pre-operative risks and complex clinical courses, achieve survival rates comparable to other indications patients.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
PIIS0003497526002109 (1).pdf
Solo gestori archvio
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
4.27 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
4.27 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


