After 7 October 2023, the long-standing Israeli-Palestinian conflict flared up again, punctuated by fragile ceasefires. The situation is under the spotlight of international criminal justice and beyond, prompting reflection on whether transitional justice mechanisms should be employed to address the past and facilitate progress. Firstly, the topic will be framed by comparing the functionality of judicial and non-judicial transitional justice mechanisms to ensure accountability for international crimes. Subsequently, having reviewed the literature on this conflict through the lens of international criminal justice, the practicability of transitional justice will be considered, as well as which type of mechanism is more effective in achieving it and its importance in building a future of peace.

Gitto, F. (2025). Giustizia di transizione nel conflitto israelo-palestinese tra meccanismi giudiziari e non giudiziari: una prospettiva sulla garanzia di accountability tra giustizia penale internazionale e coinvolgimento della società civile|Transitional justice in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict between judicial and non-judicial mechanisms: a perspective on ensuring accountability between the international criminal justice and the civil society’s involvement. JUS, 2025(5), 186-203 [10.26350/18277942_000257].

Giustizia di transizione nel conflitto israelo-palestinese tra meccanismi giudiziari e non giudiziari: una prospettiva sulla garanzia di accountability tra giustizia penale internazionale e coinvolgimento della società civile|Transitional justice in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict between judicial and non-judicial mechanisms: a perspective on ensuring accountability between the international criminal justice and the civil society’s involvement

Gitto, Federica
2025-01-01

Abstract

After 7 October 2023, the long-standing Israeli-Palestinian conflict flared up again, punctuated by fragile ceasefires. The situation is under the spotlight of international criminal justice and beyond, prompting reflection on whether transitional justice mechanisms should be employed to address the past and facilitate progress. Firstly, the topic will be framed by comparing the functionality of judicial and non-judicial transitional justice mechanisms to ensure accountability for international crimes. Subsequently, having reviewed the literature on this conflict through the lens of international criminal justice, the practicability of transitional justice will be considered, as well as which type of mechanism is more effective in achieving it and its importance in building a future of peace.
2025
Settore GIUR-13/A - Diritto processuale penale
Settore GIUR-09/A - Diritto internazionale
JUS
Gitto, F. (2025). Giustizia di transizione nel conflitto israelo-palestinese tra meccanismi giudiziari e non giudiziari: una prospettiva sulla garanzia di accountability tra giustizia penale internazionale e coinvolgimento della società civile|Transitional justice in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict between judicial and non-judicial mechanisms: a perspective on ensuring accountability between the international criminal justice and the civil society’s involvement. JUS, 2025(5), 186-203 [10.26350/18277942_000257].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
8 Gitto.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 574.47 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
574.47 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/701483
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact