Cultural shifts and feminist political struggles have led to a transformation in the analysis of gender-based violence, moving from its earlier conceptualization as an ‘exception’ ‒ to be addressed through individual responses ‒ toward an understanding of it as a structural and systemic phenomenon. This paper offers a sociological analysis of systemic gaps and innovative strategies to address the emerging needs of LGBT subjects, based on fieldwork conducted in Emilia-Romagna and Sicilia. The study explores how “plausible subjects” are constructed and recognized in public discourse and services addressing violence. Over 50 in-depth interviews were carried out with legal professionals, psychologists, activists, and staff at anti-violence and perpetrator intervention centers. Findings reveal a gap between institutional responses and grassroots initiatives, as well as a lack of adequate resources for “non-plausible” subjects ‒ those excluded due to sexuality, gender identity, or ethnicity. Adopting a queer and intersectional lens, the analysis highlights how class and race shape the very definition of violence, offering insights to reconfigure services and policies toward greater inclusivity
Rinaldi, C., Urso, M., Begnis, E., Tuzza, S., Lo Cascio, M., Sicurella, S. (2026). Soggetti “plausibili” e risorse mancanti: una lettura intersezionale della violenza di genere in relazioni LGBT. WELFARE E ERGONOMIA(2), 51-66.
Soggetti “plausibili” e risorse mancanti: una lettura intersezionale della violenza di genere in relazioni LGBT
Rinaldi C
;Urso M
;
2026-01-01
Abstract
Cultural shifts and feminist political struggles have led to a transformation in the analysis of gender-based violence, moving from its earlier conceptualization as an ‘exception’ ‒ to be addressed through individual responses ‒ toward an understanding of it as a structural and systemic phenomenon. This paper offers a sociological analysis of systemic gaps and innovative strategies to address the emerging needs of LGBT subjects, based on fieldwork conducted in Emilia-Romagna and Sicilia. The study explores how “plausible subjects” are constructed and recognized in public discourse and services addressing violence. Over 50 in-depth interviews were carried out with legal professionals, psychologists, activists, and staff at anti-violence and perpetrator intervention centers. Findings reveal a gap between institutional responses and grassroots initiatives, as well as a lack of adequate resources for “non-plausible” subjects ‒ those excluded due to sexuality, gender identity, or ethnicity. Adopting a queer and intersectional lens, the analysis highlights how class and race shape the very definition of violence, offering insights to reconfigure services and policies toward greater inclusivity| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Elisa Begnis, Maria Urso, Simone Tuzza, Martina Lo Cascio, Sandra Sicurella, Cirus Rinaldi.pdf
Solo gestori archvio
Descrizione: Articolo principale completo di frontespizio e indice
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
1.93 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.93 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


