Migration governance in Italy is characterized by a structural paradox: reception systems are formally designed to guarantee protection, yet they often reproduce precarity through bureaucratic delays, fragmented funding, and uneven territorial resources. Palermo, marked by longstanding socio-economic fragilities, offers a critical case for examining how local actors negotiate this tension within the Sistema di Accoglienza e Integrazione (SAI). This study investigates the role of professionals working in Palermo’s SAI, analyzing how they navigate restrictive national and European policies while responding to migrants’ everyday needs. Drawing on a qualitative, narrative-interpretive design within the Global-ANSWER project (H2020-MSCA-RISE-GA-872209), the research is based on semi-structured interviews conducted between January and March 2024 with 12 practitioners across seven SAI centers, including social workers, educators, cultural mediators, and coordinators. Findings identify three thematic axes: the fragility of protection systems, marked by institutional bottlenecks and housing shortages; professional mediation, as practitioners act as street-level bureaucrats translating policy into practice; and social innovation, through community-based initiatives that foster participation yet remain structurally vulnerable. The study shows that protection and precarity are co-produced, positioning professional intervention as an ethical and political practice shaping migrants’ inclusion and autonomy trajectories.
Modica, F. (2026). Between protection and precarity: professional intervention in migrant reception and social inclusion in Palermo’s SAI system. In Geopolítica de las migraciones y procesos de integración en la Unión Europea (pp. 389-415). Dykinson.
Between protection and precarity: professional intervention in migrant reception and social inclusion in Palermo’s SAI system
Felicia Modica
2026-01-01
Abstract
Migration governance in Italy is characterized by a structural paradox: reception systems are formally designed to guarantee protection, yet they often reproduce precarity through bureaucratic delays, fragmented funding, and uneven territorial resources. Palermo, marked by longstanding socio-economic fragilities, offers a critical case for examining how local actors negotiate this tension within the Sistema di Accoglienza e Integrazione (SAI). This study investigates the role of professionals working in Palermo’s SAI, analyzing how they navigate restrictive national and European policies while responding to migrants’ everyday needs. Drawing on a qualitative, narrative-interpretive design within the Global-ANSWER project (H2020-MSCA-RISE-GA-872209), the research is based on semi-structured interviews conducted between January and March 2024 with 12 practitioners across seven SAI centers, including social workers, educators, cultural mediators, and coordinators. Findings identify three thematic axes: the fragility of protection systems, marked by institutional bottlenecks and housing shortages; professional mediation, as practitioners act as street-level bureaucrats translating policy into practice; and social innovation, through community-based initiatives that foster participation yet remain structurally vulnerable. The study shows that protection and precarity are co-produced, positioning professional intervention as an ethical and political practice shaping migrants’ inclusion and autonomy trajectories.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Modica, F. (2026). Between protection and precarity professional intervention in migrant reception and social inclusion in Palermo’s SAI system. In Geopolítica de las migraciones y p.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
922.34 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
922.34 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


