This article examines the issue of athletes’ liability for injuries caused to opponents in combat sports, where the rules of the game themselves require conduct aimed at harming an adversary’s physical integrity. The author explores the distinction between the codified rules governing competitive events and the unwritten norms generally followed during training sessions. Particular attention is given to a recent ruling by the Italian Supreme Court of Cassation, which calls for a departure from the traditional“permitted risk”doctrine
Agrifoglio, G. (2026). Accettazione del rischio e sport da combattimento: dalla scriminante non codificata all’autonomia dell’ordinamento sportivo. DANNO E RESPONSABILITÀ, 1(1), 56-71.
Accettazione del rischio e sport da combattimento: dalla scriminante non codificata all’autonomia dell’ordinamento sportivo
giangabriele agrifoglio
2026-02-01
Abstract
This article examines the issue of athletes’ liability for injuries caused to opponents in combat sports, where the rules of the game themselves require conduct aimed at harming an adversary’s physical integrity. The author explores the distinction between the codified rules governing competitive events and the unwritten norms generally followed during training sessions. Particular attention is given to a recent ruling by the Italian Supreme Court of Cassation, which calls for a departure from the traditional“permitted risk”doctrine| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Agrifoglio danno e resp. 2.pdf
Solo gestori archvio
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
158.56 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
158.56 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


