Critically ill patients in Intensive Care Units are at high risk of developing invasive candidiasis (IC). Delay in diagnosis and suboptimal management contribute to high mortality rates, highlighting the need for an appropriate and patient-tailored approach. The Italian Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) convened a multidisciplinary panel, involving intensivists, infectious disease specialists, microbiologists, and pharmacologists, to develop consensus-based statements on the diagnosis and management of IC in critically ill patients. The panel formulated 13 statements addressing key aspects of care, including identification of major risk factors for IC, the role of biomarkers to support therapeutic decision-making, and optimal selection of antifungal agents based on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) considerations and site-specific characteristics. The document also provides guidance on the use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to optimize antifungal efficacy. Special attention is given to infections in specific anatomical sites, such as the peritoneal cavity, central nervous system, eye, and biofilm-associated infections, where drug penetration and activity must be carefully considered. This multidisciplinary statement offers a practical framework aimed at improving clinical decision-making for the management of invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients.

Cortegiani, A., De Pascale, G., De Angelis, G., Falcone, M., Ferrini, A., Forniti, A., et al. (2025). Diagnosis and management of invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients: SIAARTI multidisciplinary statement. JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, ANALGESIA AND CRITICAL CARE, 6(1) [10.1186/s44158-025-00299-y].

Diagnosis and management of invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients: SIAARTI multidisciplinary statement

Cortegiani, Andrea;Giarratano, Antonino
2025-12-02

Abstract

Critically ill patients in Intensive Care Units are at high risk of developing invasive candidiasis (IC). Delay in diagnosis and suboptimal management contribute to high mortality rates, highlighting the need for an appropriate and patient-tailored approach. The Italian Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) convened a multidisciplinary panel, involving intensivists, infectious disease specialists, microbiologists, and pharmacologists, to develop consensus-based statements on the diagnosis and management of IC in critically ill patients. The panel formulated 13 statements addressing key aspects of care, including identification of major risk factors for IC, the role of biomarkers to support therapeutic decision-making, and optimal selection of antifungal agents based on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) considerations and site-specific characteristics. The document also provides guidance on the use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to optimize antifungal efficacy. Special attention is given to infections in specific anatomical sites, such as the peritoneal cavity, central nervous system, eye, and biofilm-associated infections, where drug penetration and activity must be carefully considered. This multidisciplinary statement offers a practical framework aimed at improving clinical decision-making for the management of invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients.
2-dic-2025
Cortegiani, A., De Pascale, G., De Angelis, G., Falcone, M., Ferrini, A., Forniti, A., et al. (2025). Diagnosis and management of invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients: SIAARTI multidisciplinary statement. JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, ANALGESIA AND CRITICAL CARE, 6(1) [10.1186/s44158-025-00299-y].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
44158_2025_Article_299.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 950.7 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
950.7 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/698685
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact