In this paper the performance level of basic turbo-roundabouts and double-lane roundabouts are compared. Cowan’s M3 headway distribution was chosen to take into account bunched vehicles moving along each circulating lane; the Hagring model was adopted to evaluate entry capacity both at turbo-roundabout and at double-lane roundabout. The comparative analysis was performed evaluating operational performances in terms of delay suffered by users entering the intersection. Results of the analyses show that efficiency of basic turbo-roundabouts highly depend on traffic situations and can be significant when major road captures most of the traffic demand
GIUFFRE', O., GRANA', A., MARINO, S. (2012). Turbo-roundabouts vs Roundabouts Performance Level. PROCEDIA: SOCIAL & BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 53(53), 590-600 [10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.909].
Turbo-roundabouts vs Roundabouts Performance Level
GIUFFRE', Orazio;GRANA', Anna;MARINO, Sergio
2012-01-01
Abstract
In this paper the performance level of basic turbo-roundabouts and double-lane roundabouts are compared. Cowan’s M3 headway distribution was chosen to take into account bunched vehicles moving along each circulating lane; the Hagring model was adopted to evaluate entry capacity both at turbo-roundabout and at double-lane roundabout. The comparative analysis was performed evaluating operational performances in terms of delay suffered by users entering the intersection. Results of the analyses show that efficiency of basic turbo-roundabouts highly depend on traffic situations and can be significant when major road captures most of the traffic demandFile | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
GIUFFRE O_GRANA A_MARINO S_PROCEDIA 2012.pdf
Solo gestori archvio
Dimensione
594.72 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
594.72 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.