IMPORTANCE TheSequentialOrganFailureAssessment(SOFA)scorewaspublishedin1996to describeorgandysfunctionincriticallyilladultpatientsinareadilyquantifiableandsequential manner.Considerablechangeshaveoccurredoverthelast3decadesintheuseoforgansupport drugsanddevicesandinpatientoutcomes,necessitatingrevisionofthescore. OBJECTIVES Todevelopdefinitionsoforgandysfunctionthatreflectcurrentunderstandingandto identifyrepresentativevariablestogeneratearevisedSOFAscore(SOFA-2)ofindividualorgan dysfunction. EVIDENCE REVIEW Ataskforceofexpertsinintensivecaremedicineandepidemiologygenerated definitionsoforgandysfunction,identifiedrelevantvariables(physiologicalandlaboratorydata specifictotheorgansystem,pharmacologicalandmechanicalorgansupport),andproposeda0to 4–pointgradingofdysfunctionseveritythroughmeetings,Delphiprocesses,andexplicitrules, informedbydatasynthesis,includingsystematicreviewsandmeta-analysis.Variablesweretestedin 2validationexercisesusingseparatedatasetstotaling3.34millionpatientswithin10representative databasesfromdiversegeographicalandsocioeconomicsettingstoassessdistributionand predictivevalidity(mortalityatintensivecareunitdischarge). Key Points Question Cananupdatetothe SequentialOrganFailureAssessment (SOFA)scorethatreflectscurrent clinicalpracticedemonstratecontent, construct,andpredictivevalidity? Findings Inthisconsensusstatement,a modifiedDelphiprocess,systematic reviews,andanalysisofphysiological, laboratoryandorgansupportdata conductedby60expertsandusingdata from3339470patientsinadult intensivecareunitsin9countries generatedanupdatedSOFAscore (SOFA-2).Thisupdateprovidednew definitions,newvariables,andrevised thresholdstocategorizetheseverityof organdysfunction. Meaning TheSOFA-2scorecaptures contemporaneousclinicalpracticeof organsupportandorgandysfunction– associatedoutcomesinalarge, geographicallyandsocioeconomically diversepopulationofcriticallyilladults receivingcriticalcare. FINDINGS Atotalof60expertsparticipated,with18(30%)femaleparticipants.Overall,65 countrieswererepresented,with33(51%)fromEuropeandCentralAsia,13(20%)fromNorth America;and8(12%)fromLatinAmericaandtheCaribbean.Thephysiologicalvariableswithinthe6 organsystemsusedintheoriginalSOFAscorewereretained,althoughsomecategorieswere renamed(ie,centralnervoussystemwaschangedtobrain,renaltokidney,coagulationto hemostasis,andhepatictoliver).Revisionsoforgansupportdruganddevicevariablesweremadeto reflectcurrentpractice.Alternativevariableswereaddedforinstanceswhenlaboratorydataand/or organsupportinterventionswouldbeinaccessible(eg,insomelow-resourcesettings)ornot indicated(eg,ceilingoftreatment).Somepointcutoffthresholdsweremodifiedbasedonevidence fromsystematicreviewsanddataanalyses.Scorescouldnotbedevelopedfor2additionalorgan systems(gastrointestinalandimmune)duetoinsufficientdata,complexity,orlackofcontentand predictivevalidityforthevariablesassessed.Explicitrulesweredevelopedtofacilitatescoring consistency. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Throughamethodologicallyrobustdevelopmentprocess,the SOFA-2scoreoffersupdateddefinitionstodescribeorgandysfunctioninadultpatientsrequiring criticalcareandreadilyquantifiablecriteriatogradethedegreeofdysfunctioninindividualorgan systems.Thisscoreconsiderscontemporaneouschangesinpatientmanagementandoutcomes.
Moreno, R., Rhodes, A., Ranzani, O., Salluh, J.I.F., Berger-Estilita, J., Coopersmith, C.M., et al. (2025). Rationale and Methodological Approach Underlying the Development of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)–2 Score. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 8(10) [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.45040].
Rationale and Methodological Approach Underlying the Development of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)–2 Score
Ippolito, Mariachiara;
2025-10-29
Abstract
IMPORTANCE TheSequentialOrganFailureAssessment(SOFA)scorewaspublishedin1996to describeorgandysfunctionincriticallyilladultpatientsinareadilyquantifiableandsequential manner.Considerablechangeshaveoccurredoverthelast3decadesintheuseoforgansupport drugsanddevicesandinpatientoutcomes,necessitatingrevisionofthescore. OBJECTIVES Todevelopdefinitionsoforgandysfunctionthatreflectcurrentunderstandingandto identifyrepresentativevariablestogeneratearevisedSOFAscore(SOFA-2)ofindividualorgan dysfunction. EVIDENCE REVIEW Ataskforceofexpertsinintensivecaremedicineandepidemiologygenerated definitionsoforgandysfunction,identifiedrelevantvariables(physiologicalandlaboratorydata specifictotheorgansystem,pharmacologicalandmechanicalorgansupport),andproposeda0to 4–pointgradingofdysfunctionseveritythroughmeetings,Delphiprocesses,andexplicitrules, informedbydatasynthesis,includingsystematicreviewsandmeta-analysis.Variablesweretestedin 2validationexercisesusingseparatedatasetstotaling3.34millionpatientswithin10representative databasesfromdiversegeographicalandsocioeconomicsettingstoassessdistributionand predictivevalidity(mortalityatintensivecareunitdischarge). Key Points Question Cananupdatetothe SequentialOrganFailureAssessment (SOFA)scorethatreflectscurrent clinicalpracticedemonstratecontent, construct,andpredictivevalidity? Findings Inthisconsensusstatement,a modifiedDelphiprocess,systematic reviews,andanalysisofphysiological, laboratoryandorgansupportdata conductedby60expertsandusingdata from3339470patientsinadult intensivecareunitsin9countries generatedanupdatedSOFAscore (SOFA-2).Thisupdateprovidednew definitions,newvariables,andrevised thresholdstocategorizetheseverityof organdysfunction. Meaning TheSOFA-2scorecaptures contemporaneousclinicalpracticeof organsupportandorgandysfunction– associatedoutcomesinalarge, geographicallyandsocioeconomically diversepopulationofcriticallyilladults receivingcriticalcare. FINDINGS Atotalof60expertsparticipated,with18(30%)femaleparticipants.Overall,65 countrieswererepresented,with33(51%)fromEuropeandCentralAsia,13(20%)fromNorth America;and8(12%)fromLatinAmericaandtheCaribbean.Thephysiologicalvariableswithinthe6 organsystemsusedintheoriginalSOFAscorewereretained,althoughsomecategorieswere renamed(ie,centralnervoussystemwaschangedtobrain,renaltokidney,coagulationto hemostasis,andhepatictoliver).Revisionsoforgansupportdruganddevicevariablesweremadeto reflectcurrentpractice.Alternativevariableswereaddedforinstanceswhenlaboratorydataand/or organsupportinterventionswouldbeinaccessible(eg,insomelow-resourcesettings)ornot indicated(eg,ceilingoftreatment).Somepointcutoffthresholdsweremodifiedbasedonevidence fromsystematicreviewsanddataanalyses.Scorescouldnotbedevelopedfor2additionalorgan systems(gastrointestinalandimmune)duetoinsufficientdata,complexity,orlackofcontentand predictivevalidityforthevariablesassessed.Explicitrulesweredevelopedtofacilitatescoring consistency. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Throughamethodologicallyrobustdevelopmentprocess,the SOFA-2scoreoffersupdateddefinitionstodescribeorgandysfunctioninadultpatientsrequiring criticalcareandreadilyquantifiablecriteriatogradethedegreeofdysfunctioninindividualorgan systems.Thisscoreconsiderscontemporaneouschangesinpatientmanagementandoutcomes.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
moreno_2025_cs_250006_1761316019.42714.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
1.14 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.14 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


