IMPORTANCE TheSequentialOrganFailureAssessment(SOFA)scorewaspublishedin1996to describeorgandysfunctionincriticallyilladultpatientsinareadilyquantifiableandsequential manner.Considerablechangeshaveoccurredoverthelast3decadesintheuseoforgansupport drugsanddevicesandinpatientoutcomes,necessitatingrevisionofthescore. OBJECTIVES Todevelopdefinitionsoforgandysfunctionthatreflectcurrentunderstandingandto identifyrepresentativevariablestogeneratearevisedSOFAscore(SOFA-2)ofindividualorgan dysfunction. EVIDENCE REVIEW Ataskforceofexpertsinintensivecaremedicineandepidemiologygenerated definitionsoforgandysfunction,identifiedrelevantvariables(physiologicalandlaboratorydata specifictotheorgansystem,pharmacologicalandmechanicalorgansupport),andproposeda0to 4–pointgradingofdysfunctionseveritythroughmeetings,Delphiprocesses,andexplicitrules, informedbydatasynthesis,includingsystematicreviewsandmeta-analysis.Variablesweretestedin 2validationexercisesusingseparatedatasetstotaling3.34millionpatientswithin10representative databasesfromdiversegeographicalandsocioeconomicsettingstoassessdistributionand predictivevalidity(mortalityatintensivecareunitdischarge). Key Points Question Cananupdatetothe SequentialOrganFailureAssessment (SOFA)scorethatreflectscurrent clinicalpracticedemonstratecontent, construct,andpredictivevalidity? Findings Inthisconsensusstatement,a modifiedDelphiprocess,systematic reviews,andanalysisofphysiological, laboratoryandorgansupportdata conductedby60expertsandusingdata from3339470patientsinadult intensivecareunitsin9countries generatedanupdatedSOFAscore (SOFA-2).Thisupdateprovidednew definitions,newvariables,andrevised thresholdstocategorizetheseverityof organdysfunction. Meaning TheSOFA-2scorecaptures contemporaneousclinicalpracticeof organsupportandorgandysfunction– associatedoutcomesinalarge, geographicallyandsocioeconomically diversepopulationofcriticallyilladults receivingcriticalcare. FINDINGS Atotalof60expertsparticipated,with18(30%)femaleparticipants.Overall,65 countrieswererepresented,with33(51%)fromEuropeandCentralAsia,13(20%)fromNorth America;and8(12%)fromLatinAmericaandtheCaribbean.Thephysiologicalvariableswithinthe6 organsystemsusedintheoriginalSOFAscorewereretained,althoughsomecategorieswere renamed(ie,centralnervoussystemwaschangedtobrain,renaltokidney,coagulationto hemostasis,andhepatictoliver).Revisionsoforgansupportdruganddevicevariablesweremadeto reflectcurrentpractice.Alternativevariableswereaddedforinstanceswhenlaboratorydataand/or organsupportinterventionswouldbeinaccessible(eg,insomelow-resourcesettings)ornot indicated(eg,ceilingoftreatment).Somepointcutoffthresholdsweremodifiedbasedonevidence fromsystematicreviewsanddataanalyses.Scorescouldnotbedevelopedfor2additionalorgan systems(gastrointestinalandimmune)duetoinsufficientdata,complexity,orlackofcontentand predictivevalidityforthevariablesassessed.Explicitrulesweredevelopedtofacilitatescoring consistency. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Throughamethodologicallyrobustdevelopmentprocess,the SOFA-2scoreoffersupdateddefinitionstodescribeorgandysfunctioninadultpatientsrequiring criticalcareandreadilyquantifiablecriteriatogradethedegreeofdysfunctioninindividualorgan systems.Thisscoreconsiderscontemporaneouschangesinpatientmanagementandoutcomes.

Moreno, R., Rhodes, A., Ranzani, O., Salluh, J.I.F., Berger-Estilita, J., Coopersmith, C.M., et al. (2025). Rationale and Methodological Approach Underlying the Development of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)–2 Score. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 8(10) [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.45040].

Rationale and Methodological Approach Underlying the Development of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)–2 Score

Ippolito, Mariachiara;
2025-10-29

Abstract

IMPORTANCE TheSequentialOrganFailureAssessment(SOFA)scorewaspublishedin1996to describeorgandysfunctionincriticallyilladultpatientsinareadilyquantifiableandsequential manner.Considerablechangeshaveoccurredoverthelast3decadesintheuseoforgansupport drugsanddevicesandinpatientoutcomes,necessitatingrevisionofthescore. OBJECTIVES Todevelopdefinitionsoforgandysfunctionthatreflectcurrentunderstandingandto identifyrepresentativevariablestogeneratearevisedSOFAscore(SOFA-2)ofindividualorgan dysfunction. EVIDENCE REVIEW Ataskforceofexpertsinintensivecaremedicineandepidemiologygenerated definitionsoforgandysfunction,identifiedrelevantvariables(physiologicalandlaboratorydata specifictotheorgansystem,pharmacologicalandmechanicalorgansupport),andproposeda0to 4–pointgradingofdysfunctionseveritythroughmeetings,Delphiprocesses,andexplicitrules, informedbydatasynthesis,includingsystematicreviewsandmeta-analysis.Variablesweretestedin 2validationexercisesusingseparatedatasetstotaling3.34millionpatientswithin10representative databasesfromdiversegeographicalandsocioeconomicsettingstoassessdistributionand predictivevalidity(mortalityatintensivecareunitdischarge). Key Points Question Cananupdatetothe SequentialOrganFailureAssessment (SOFA)scorethatreflectscurrent clinicalpracticedemonstratecontent, construct,andpredictivevalidity? Findings Inthisconsensusstatement,a modifiedDelphiprocess,systematic reviews,andanalysisofphysiological, laboratoryandorgansupportdata conductedby60expertsandusingdata from3339470patientsinadult intensivecareunitsin9countries generatedanupdatedSOFAscore (SOFA-2).Thisupdateprovidednew definitions,newvariables,andrevised thresholdstocategorizetheseverityof organdysfunction. Meaning TheSOFA-2scorecaptures contemporaneousclinicalpracticeof organsupportandorgandysfunction– associatedoutcomesinalarge, geographicallyandsocioeconomically diversepopulationofcriticallyilladults receivingcriticalcare. FINDINGS Atotalof60expertsparticipated,with18(30%)femaleparticipants.Overall,65 countrieswererepresented,with33(51%)fromEuropeandCentralAsia,13(20%)fromNorth America;and8(12%)fromLatinAmericaandtheCaribbean.Thephysiologicalvariableswithinthe6 organsystemsusedintheoriginalSOFAscorewereretained,althoughsomecategorieswere renamed(ie,centralnervoussystemwaschangedtobrain,renaltokidney,coagulationto hemostasis,andhepatictoliver).Revisionsoforgansupportdruganddevicevariablesweremadeto reflectcurrentpractice.Alternativevariableswereaddedforinstanceswhenlaboratorydataand/or organsupportinterventionswouldbeinaccessible(eg,insomelow-resourcesettings)ornot indicated(eg,ceilingoftreatment).Somepointcutoffthresholdsweremodifiedbasedonevidence fromsystematicreviewsanddataanalyses.Scorescouldnotbedevelopedfor2additionalorgan systems(gastrointestinalandimmune)duetoinsufficientdata,complexity,orlackofcontentand predictivevalidityforthevariablesassessed.Explicitrulesweredevelopedtofacilitatescoring consistency. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Throughamethodologicallyrobustdevelopmentprocess,the SOFA-2scoreoffersupdateddefinitionstodescribeorgandysfunctioninadultpatientsrequiring criticalcareandreadilyquantifiablecriteriatogradethedegreeofdysfunctioninindividualorgan systems.Thisscoreconsiderscontemporaneouschangesinpatientmanagementandoutcomes.
29-ott-2025
Settore MEDS-23/A - Anestesiologia
Moreno, R., Rhodes, A., Ranzani, O., Salluh, J.I.F., Berger-Estilita, J., Coopersmith, C.M., et al. (2025). Rationale and Methodological Approach Underlying the Development of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)–2 Score. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 8(10) [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.45040].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
moreno_2025_cs_250006_1761316019.42714.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 1.14 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.14 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/692593
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact