This study presents a comparison of two advanced wastewater treatment technologies operating under intermittent aeration (IA): the Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) (Period I) and the Integrated Fixed Film Activated Sludge (IFAS)-MBR (Period II). Both technologies were applied to a pilot plant at the Water Resource Recovery of Palermo University and operated to remove carbon and nutrients from real wastewater. The ultimate goal was to provide a comprehensive comparison in terms of: carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus removal, nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, membrane fouling, and carbon footprint. Results showed a better performance in nitrogen processes for IFAS-MBR during Period II. Total nitrogen removal efficiencies were 76 % and 83 % for Period I and II, respectively. The total N2O emissions were 1.7 % and 0.38 % for Period I and II, respectively. Conversely, the carbon footprint increased during Period II due to a higher membrane fouling rate and sewage sludge production of 2.5 and 2.8 kgCO2,eq m−3 for Period I and II, respectively. The experiments confirmed the beneficial role played by the biofilm in terms of the reduction/mitigation of N2O emissions.

Mineo, A., Bosco Mofatto, P.M., Cosenza, A., Di Trapani, D., Mannina, G. (2025). Membrane bioreactor operated under intermittent aeration a comprehensive comparison with an IFAS-MBR: A pilot plant experience. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 13(5) [10.1016/j.jece.2025.118668].

Membrane bioreactor operated under intermittent aeration a comprehensive comparison with an IFAS-MBR: A pilot plant experience

Mineo, Antonio
Primo
;
Bosco Mofatto, Paulo Marcelo;Cosenza, Alida;Di Trapani, Daniele
;
Mannina, Giorgio
Ultimo
2025-10-01

Abstract

This study presents a comparison of two advanced wastewater treatment technologies operating under intermittent aeration (IA): the Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) (Period I) and the Integrated Fixed Film Activated Sludge (IFAS)-MBR (Period II). Both technologies were applied to a pilot plant at the Water Resource Recovery of Palermo University and operated to remove carbon and nutrients from real wastewater. The ultimate goal was to provide a comprehensive comparison in terms of: carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus removal, nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, membrane fouling, and carbon footprint. Results showed a better performance in nitrogen processes for IFAS-MBR during Period II. Total nitrogen removal efficiencies were 76 % and 83 % for Period I and II, respectively. The total N2O emissions were 1.7 % and 0.38 % for Period I and II, respectively. Conversely, the carbon footprint increased during Period II due to a higher membrane fouling rate and sewage sludge production of 2.5 and 2.8 kgCO2,eq m−3 for Period I and II, respectively. The experiments confirmed the beneficial role played by the biofilm in terms of the reduction/mitigation of N2O emissions.
ott-2025
Settore CEAR-02/A - Ingegneria sanitaria-ambientale
Mineo, A., Bosco Mofatto, P.M., Cosenza, A., Di Trapani, D., Mannina, G. (2025). Membrane bioreactor operated under intermittent aeration a comprehensive comparison with an IFAS-MBR: A pilot plant experience. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 13(5) [10.1016/j.jece.2025.118668].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S2213343725033640-main.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 1.8 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.8 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/692083
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact