This study presents a comparison of two advanced wastewater treatment technologies operating under intermittent aeration (IA): the Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) (Period I) and the Integrated Fixed Film Activated Sludge (IFAS)-MBR (Period II). Both technologies were applied to a pilot plant at the Water Resource Recovery of Palermo University and operated to remove carbon and nutrients from real wastewater. The ultimate goal was to provide a comprehensive comparison in terms of: carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus removal, nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, membrane fouling, and carbon footprint. Results showed a better performance in nitrogen processes for IFAS-MBR during Period II. Total nitrogen removal efficiencies were 76 % and 83 % for Period I and II, respectively. The total N2O emissions were 1.7 % and 0.38 % for Period I and II, respectively. Conversely, the carbon footprint increased during Period II due to a higher membrane fouling rate and sewage sludge production of 2.5 and 2.8 kgCO2,eq m−3 for Period I and II, respectively. The experiments confirmed the beneficial role played by the biofilm in terms of the reduction/mitigation of N2O emissions.
Mineo, A., Bosco Mofatto, P.M., Cosenza, A., Di Trapani, D., Mannina, G. (2025). Membrane bioreactor operated under intermittent aeration a comprehensive comparison with an IFAS-MBR: A pilot plant experience. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 13(5) [10.1016/j.jece.2025.118668].
Membrane bioreactor operated under intermittent aeration a comprehensive comparison with an IFAS-MBR: A pilot plant experience
Mineo, AntonioPrimo
;Bosco Mofatto, Paulo Marcelo;Cosenza, Alida;Di Trapani, Daniele
;Mannina, GiorgioUltimo
2025-10-01
Abstract
This study presents a comparison of two advanced wastewater treatment technologies operating under intermittent aeration (IA): the Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) (Period I) and the Integrated Fixed Film Activated Sludge (IFAS)-MBR (Period II). Both technologies were applied to a pilot plant at the Water Resource Recovery of Palermo University and operated to remove carbon and nutrients from real wastewater. The ultimate goal was to provide a comprehensive comparison in terms of: carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus removal, nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, membrane fouling, and carbon footprint. Results showed a better performance in nitrogen processes for IFAS-MBR during Period II. Total nitrogen removal efficiencies were 76 % and 83 % for Period I and II, respectively. The total N2O emissions were 1.7 % and 0.38 % for Period I and II, respectively. Conversely, the carbon footprint increased during Period II due to a higher membrane fouling rate and sewage sludge production of 2.5 and 2.8 kgCO2,eq m−3 for Period I and II, respectively. The experiments confirmed the beneficial role played by the biofilm in terms of the reduction/mitigation of N2O emissions.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-s2.0-S2213343725033640-main.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
1.8 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.8 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


