Heidegger’s and Derrida’s deconstructions, rather than dismissing it, leave us the legacy of a precise idea of metaphysics: this is the thesis that the author argues, deliberately focusing on the common element between the two perspectives, while being aware of their notable differences. But today we must re-engage with this idea; it is, in fact, an idea of metaphysics that is deeply conflicted, one that does not allow us to settle into the meaning of presence, nor into the resources of an ontology that develops from the interrogation of what is.
Caldarone, R. (2025). Quale metafisica per la decostruzione?. GIORNALE DI METAFISICA(1), 27-32.
Quale metafisica per la decostruzione?
Rosaria Caldarone
2025-01-01
Abstract
Heidegger’s and Derrida’s deconstructions, rather than dismissing it, leave us the legacy of a precise idea of metaphysics: this is the thesis that the author argues, deliberately focusing on the common element between the two perspectives, while being aware of their notable differences. But today we must re-engage with this idea; it is, in fact, an idea of metaphysics that is deeply conflicted, one that does not allow us to settle into the meaning of presence, nor into the resources of an ontology that develops from the interrogation of what is.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
GdM 1-2025 unito, con copertina.pdf
Solo gestori archvio
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
2.33 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.33 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
