With the sentence of February 13, 2024, No. 16760/22, Executief van de Moslims van België and others. v. Belgium, the ECtHR ruled on the possibility that animal welfare could constitute a restriction on freedom of religion. Fitting into a troubled jurisprudential framework, which has seen the European Court of Justice take a position on the point on several occasions, the ECtHR’s decision seems to take on an innovative significance as it brings together the protection of animal welfare, under- stood as a principle of law, with the concept of public morality.
Gjomarkaj, M. (2025). Brevi considerazioni sulla sentenza della Corte EDU, n.16760/22 del 2024. DIRITTO AGROALIMENTARE(1), 169-185.
Brevi considerazioni sulla sentenza della Corte EDU, n.16760/22 del 2024
Marco Gjomarkaj
2025-01-01
Abstract
With the sentence of February 13, 2024, No. 16760/22, Executief van de Moslims van België and others. v. Belgium, the ECtHR ruled on the possibility that animal welfare could constitute a restriction on freedom of religion. Fitting into a troubled jurisprudential framework, which has seen the European Court of Justice take a position on the point on several occasions, the ECtHR’s decision seems to take on an innovative significance as it brings together the protection of animal welfare, under- stood as a principle of law, with the concept of public morality.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
M. Gjomarkaj - D. Agroalimentare 1-2025 .pdf
Solo gestori archvio
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
470.48 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
470.48 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
