Human-Robot Collaboration (HRC) is paramount to move toward efficient and sustainable manufacturing systems. Nonetheless, the successful integration of collaborative robots (cobots) in workplaces strongly depends on workers’ acceptance, which is affected by a complex set of individual, organizational and technical factors. As a result, understanding these factors is crucial to ensure effective cobots implementation into industrial environments while ensuring the workers well-being and safety. To this aim, a bibliometric analysis and a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) are carried out in this paper to provide a comprehensive overview of key perceived benefits and concerns influencing the workers’ acceptance of cobots in industrial settings. The most researched topics, and the possible future research directions are identified. In line with the Industry 5.0 paradigm, the reviewed articles highlight the central role of adaptive systems, human-centered design principles, and standardized safety protocols. Physical and cognitive ergonomic factors emerge as essential, while tailored communication methods are shown to significantly impact the worker attitude toward cobots. Furthermore, the integration of virtual reality tools for design optimization and immersive worker training environments seems to be highly promising to mitigate safety concerns and improve familiarity prior implementation.

La Fata, C.M., Giallanza, A., La Scalia, G., Micale, R. (2025). Toward acceptance of human‑robot collaboration in industrial settings: a bibliometric and systematic literature review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 139(5-6), 2139-2160 [10.1007/s00170-025-16039-z].

Toward acceptance of human‑robot collaboration in industrial settings: a bibliometric and systematic literature review

La Fata Concetta Manuela;Giallanza Antonio
;
La Scalia Giada;Micale Rosa
2025-07-08

Abstract

Human-Robot Collaboration (HRC) is paramount to move toward efficient and sustainable manufacturing systems. Nonetheless, the successful integration of collaborative robots (cobots) in workplaces strongly depends on workers’ acceptance, which is affected by a complex set of individual, organizational and technical factors. As a result, understanding these factors is crucial to ensure effective cobots implementation into industrial environments while ensuring the workers well-being and safety. To this aim, a bibliometric analysis and a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) are carried out in this paper to provide a comprehensive overview of key perceived benefits and concerns influencing the workers’ acceptance of cobots in industrial settings. The most researched topics, and the possible future research directions are identified. In line with the Industry 5.0 paradigm, the reviewed articles highlight the central role of adaptive systems, human-centered design principles, and standardized safety protocols. Physical and cognitive ergonomic factors emerge as essential, while tailored communication methods are shown to significantly impact the worker attitude toward cobots. Furthermore, the integration of virtual reality tools for design optimization and immersive worker training environments seems to be highly promising to mitigate safety concerns and improve familiarity prior implementation.
8-lug-2025
Settore IIND-05/A - Impianti industriali meccanici
La Fata, C.M., Giallanza, A., La Scalia, G., Micale, R. (2025). Toward acceptance of human‑robot collaboration in industrial settings: a bibliometric and systematic literature review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 139(5-6), 2139-2160 [10.1007/s00170-025-16039-z].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s00170-025-16039-z.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 1.4 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.4 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/688444
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact