Nature-inspired metaheuristics have proven effective for addressing complex structural optimization challenges where traditional deterministic or gradient-based methods often fall short. This study investigates the feasibility and benefits of embedding three prominent metaheuristic algorithms, the Genetic Algorithm (GA), the Firefly Algorithm (FA), and the Group Search Optimizer (GSO) embedded into the ANSYS Parametric Design Language (APDL). The performance of each optimizer was assessed in three case studies. The first two are spatial truss structures, one comprising 22 bars and the other 25 bars, commonly used in structural optimization research. The third is a planar 15-bar truss in which member sizing and internal topology were simultaneously refined using a Discrete Topology (DT) variable method. For both the FA and the GSO, enhanced ranger-movement strategies were implemented to improve exploration–exploitation balance. Comparative analyses were conducted to assess convergence behavior, solution quality, and computational efficiency across the different metaheuristics. The results underscore the practical advantages of a fully integrated APDL approach, highlighting improvements in execution speed, workflow automation, and overall robustness. This work not only provides a comprehensive performance comparison of GA, FA, and GSO in structural optimization tasks, but it can also be considered a novelty in employing native APDL routines for metaheuristic-based finite element analysis.

Cirello A., Ingrassia T., Mancuso A., Marannano G., Mirulla A.I., Ricotta V. (2025). Evaluating the Efficiency of Nature-Inspired Algorithms for Finite Element Optimization in the ANSYS Environment. APPLIED SCIENCES, 15(12), 1-20 [10.3390/app15126750].

Evaluating the Efficiency of Nature-Inspired Algorithms for Finite Element Optimization in the ANSYS Environment

Cirello A.;Ingrassia T.;Mancuso A.;Marannano G.
;
Mirulla A. I.;Ricotta V.
2025-06-16

Abstract

Nature-inspired metaheuristics have proven effective for addressing complex structural optimization challenges where traditional deterministic or gradient-based methods often fall short. This study investigates the feasibility and benefits of embedding three prominent metaheuristic algorithms, the Genetic Algorithm (GA), the Firefly Algorithm (FA), and the Group Search Optimizer (GSO) embedded into the ANSYS Parametric Design Language (APDL). The performance of each optimizer was assessed in three case studies. The first two are spatial truss structures, one comprising 22 bars and the other 25 bars, commonly used in structural optimization research. The third is a planar 15-bar truss in which member sizing and internal topology were simultaneously refined using a Discrete Topology (DT) variable method. For both the FA and the GSO, enhanced ranger-movement strategies were implemented to improve exploration–exploitation balance. Comparative analyses were conducted to assess convergence behavior, solution quality, and computational efficiency across the different metaheuristics. The results underscore the practical advantages of a fully integrated APDL approach, highlighting improvements in execution speed, workflow automation, and overall robustness. This work not only provides a comprehensive performance comparison of GA, FA, and GSO in structural optimization tasks, but it can also be considered a novelty in employing native APDL routines for metaheuristic-based finite element analysis.
16-giu-2025
Settore IIND-03/B - Disegno e metodi dell'ingegneria industriale
Cirello A., Ingrassia T., Mancuso A., Marannano G., Mirulla A.I., Ricotta V. (2025). Evaluating the Efficiency of Nature-Inspired Algorithms for Finite Element Optimization in the ANSYS Environment. APPLIED SCIENCES, 15(12), 1-20 [10.3390/app15126750].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
applsci-15-06750.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 7.61 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
7.61 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/684559
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact