We reconstruct Sraffa’s position with regard to counterfactual reasoning in the second half of the 1920s as documented by his hitherto unpublished papers. While Sraffa did not use the term “counterfactual”, it is precisely this concept he had in mind, when he examined certain non-purely observational propositions and discussed the responses to ‘What if?’ questions. He did so with respect to different contexts. His attention focused however primarily on the marginal theory of value and distribution. Sraffa’s method of inquiry can be interpreted as an instance of abductive reasoning. The paper confirms Sen’s interpretation that Sraffa met counterfactual reasoning with suspicion, since it might easily lead to highly misleading propositions. But Sraffa’s manuscripts do not support the extreme view (not entertained by Sen) that any counterfactual reasoning ought to be rejected.
Kurz, H.D., Salvadori, N., Signorino, R. (2025). Piero Sraffa and Counterfactuals: A View from Sraffa's Unpublished Papers in the Late 1920s. HISTORY OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 57(3), 477-520 [10.1215/00182702-11773468].
Piero Sraffa and Counterfactuals: A View from Sraffa's Unpublished Papers in the Late 1920s
Signorino, RodolfoMembro del Collaboration Group
2025-06-01
Abstract
We reconstruct Sraffa’s position with regard to counterfactual reasoning in the second half of the 1920s as documented by his hitherto unpublished papers. While Sraffa did not use the term “counterfactual”, it is precisely this concept he had in mind, when he examined certain non-purely observational propositions and discussed the responses to ‘What if?’ questions. He did so with respect to different contexts. His attention focused however primarily on the marginal theory of value and distribution. Sraffa’s method of inquiry can be interpreted as an instance of abductive reasoning. The paper confirms Sen’s interpretation that Sraffa met counterfactual reasoning with suspicion, since it might easily lead to highly misleading propositions. But Sraffa’s manuscripts do not support the extreme view (not entertained by Sen) that any counterfactual reasoning ought to be rejected.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
HOPE Kurz Salvadori Signorino.pdf
Solo gestori archvio
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
1.6 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.6 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.