Comparing mobility is an important but controversial issue. In this paper, we argue that in a specific and relevant case, there exists a univocal and non-controversial definition of greater (exchange) mobility that allows for unambiguous comparisons. We conducted a questionnaire experiment to investigate whether people's perceptions of social mobility align with this definition, and we found that people's choices are broadly in line with the theoretical predictions.
Michele Bernasconi, Giulio Cinquanta, Valentino Dardanoni, Vincenzo Prete (2025). Mobility Comparisons: Theoretical Definitions and People's Perceptions. GAMES, 16(3) [10.3390/g16030024].
Mobility Comparisons: Theoretical Definitions and People's Perceptions
Valentino Dardanoni;Vincenzo Prete
2025-05-08
Abstract
Comparing mobility is an important but controversial issue. In this paper, we argue that in a specific and relevant case, there exists a univocal and non-controversial definition of greater (exchange) mobility that allows for unambiguous comparisons. We conducted a questionnaire experiment to investigate whether people's perceptions of social mobility align with this definition, and we found that people's choices are broadly in line with the theoretical predictions.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
BCDP_games.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
900.62 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
900.62 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
