In September 1804 the French painter Antoine-Jean Gros first exhibited the painting Bonaparte visitant les pestiférés de Jaf-fa, illustrating Bonaparte touching the bubo of a plague-strick-en soldier in Jaffa hospital during the Egyptian campaign. To-day, this work is interpreted as blatant propaganda. However, the use of primary sources to reconstruct how people experi-enced illness in the past is essential. In this work, for the first time we propose a primarily medical interpretation of Gros’s painting. According to medicine prior to the “germ theory”, fear was considered a moral affection negatively influenc-ing both the contagion and the outcome of plague. Therefore, holding back the fear was the best way to prevent the plague. French medical officers acted accordingly, providing encouraging examples to the soldiers. Especially, the medical officer Desgenettes voluntarily exposed himself to the risk of conta-gion, inoculating himself with a contaminated lancet. Napo-leon’s act of touching the bubo depicted by Gros in the painting provided soldiers with another encouraging demonstration of genuine therapeutic value, considering the medicine of the time. It seems, therefore, plausible to conclude that Gros faith-fully represented a situation imbued with medical meaning, fully understandable by the public.

Damiani E., Varotto E., Galassi F.M. (2024). Antoine Gros’s Bonaparte Visitant les Pestiférés de Jaffa: Propaganda or a Medical Illustration?. MEDICINA NEI SECOLI, 36(2), 159-178 [10.13133/2531-7288/2989].

Antoine Gros’s Bonaparte Visitant les Pestiférés de Jaffa: Propaganda or a Medical Illustration?

Damiani E.
;
Varotto E.
;
2024-01-01

Abstract

In September 1804 the French painter Antoine-Jean Gros first exhibited the painting Bonaparte visitant les pestiférés de Jaf-fa, illustrating Bonaparte touching the bubo of a plague-strick-en soldier in Jaffa hospital during the Egyptian campaign. To-day, this work is interpreted as blatant propaganda. However, the use of primary sources to reconstruct how people experi-enced illness in the past is essential. In this work, for the first time we propose a primarily medical interpretation of Gros’s painting. According to medicine prior to the “germ theory”, fear was considered a moral affection negatively influenc-ing both the contagion and the outcome of plague. Therefore, holding back the fear was the best way to prevent the plague. French medical officers acted accordingly, providing encouraging examples to the soldiers. Especially, the medical officer Desgenettes voluntarily exposed himself to the risk of conta-gion, inoculating himself with a contaminated lancet. Napo-leon’s act of touching the bubo depicted by Gros in the painting provided soldiers with another encouraging demonstration of genuine therapeutic value, considering the medicine of the time. It seems, therefore, plausible to conclude that Gros faith-fully represented a situation imbued with medical meaning, fully understandable by the public.
2024
Settore BIOS-03/B - Antropologia
Settore MEDS-02/A - Patologia generale
Damiani E., Varotto E., Galassi F.M. (2024). Antoine Gros’s Bonaparte Visitant les Pestiférés de Jaffa: Propaganda or a Medical Illustration?. MEDICINA NEI SECOLI, 36(2), 159-178 [10.13133/2531-7288/2989].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Antoine Gros’s Bonaparte.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 2.15 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.15 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/673039
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact